Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(insights): use internal find util method #4580

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 17, 2020

Conversation

francoischalifour
Copy link
Member

@francoischalifour francoischalifour commented Nov 17, 2020

Description

In #4575 we introduced a regression in IE because we used the native find method instead of our internal util.

Related

@francoischalifour francoischalifour requested a review from a team November 17, 2020 15:14
@ghost ghost requested review from shortcuts and yannickcr and removed request for a team November 17, 2020 15:14
@codesandbox-ci
Copy link

This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox.

To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA.

Latest deployment of this branch, based on commit 95dd6e5:

Sandbox Source
InstantSearch.js Configuration

@francoischalifour francoischalifour merged commit 61b855b into master Nov 17, 2020
@francoischalifour francoischalifour deleted the fix/insights-middleware-find-util branch November 17, 2020 15:33
@Haroenv
Copy link
Contributor

Haroenv commented Nov 18, 2020

I'll think if we can add a browser compat test, since the e2e test clearly doesn't catch this

@eunjae-lee
Copy link
Contributor

I'm wondering how the e2e tests were successful in IE env in the first place.

@francoischalifour
Copy link
Member Author

Wondering too...

@Haroenv
Copy link
Contributor

Haroenv commented Nov 18, 2020

the insights middleware must not have been used on the e2e test @eunjae-lee

otherwise maybe too many polyfills were enabled?

@eunjae-lee
Copy link
Contributor

the insights middleware must not have been used on the e2e test @eunjae-lee

that must be it

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants