Skip to content

Conversation

hoh
Copy link
Member

@hoh hoh commented Feb 11, 2025

This bumps their versions to

  • Firecracker 1.5.0 -> 1.10.1
  • Kubo 0.23.0 -> 0.33.2

Most changes related to Firecracker are regarding the snapshots, which are not used by aleph-vm.

The list of changes regarding Kubo too large to be mentioned here, but I mostly expect performance improvements as the main API has not changed much.

Jira tickets : ALEPH-413

@hoh hoh requested a review from olethanh February 11, 2025 17:00
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 11, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 63.34%. Comparing base (1c2c180) to head (0d0e8a2).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #748   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   63.34%   63.34%           
=======================================
  Files          77       77           
  Lines        6848     6848           
  Branches      568      568           
=======================================
  Hits         4338     4338           
  Misses       2329     2329           
  Partials      181      181           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@hoh hoh force-pushed the hoh-upgrade-dependencies branch from 82d2d9e to 78bedf1 Compare February 27, 2025 11:47
@hoh
Copy link
Member Author

hoh commented Feb 27, 2025

Regarding Kubo:

image

@hoh hoh force-pushed the hoh-upgrade-dependencies branch 2 times, most recently from db90cef to 50c70dd Compare February 27, 2025 16:46
This bumps their versions to
- Firecracker 1.5.0 -> 1.10.1
- Kubo 0.23.0 -> 0.33.1

Most changes related to Firecracker are regarding the snapshots, which are not used by `aleph-vm`.

The list of changes regarding Kubo too large to be mentioned here, but I mostly expect performance improvements as the main API has not changed much.
@hoh hoh force-pushed the hoh-upgrade-dependencies branch from c7920f0 to 0d0e8a2 Compare March 4, 2025 12:31
@hoh
Copy link
Member Author

hoh commented Mar 4, 2025

Replaced with #770 and #771

@hoh hoh closed this Mar 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant