Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Optimizing process labels #861

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 18, 2024
Merged

Conversation

mikibonacci
Copy link
Member

@mikibonacci mikibonacci commented Oct 14, 2024

This fixes #858

The main change is the label for unrelaxed. From relax: none to unrelaxed.

Examples of process labels:

No relax, magnetic:
Screenshot from 2024-10-14 10-23-58

relax:
Screenshot from 2024-10-14 10-24-23

No properties except vc-relax:
Screenshot from 2024-10-14 10-24-46

As you can see from above, the structure formula is used by default for the labels. However, if the users attach a specific label to the structure in step 1, this is used instead. For example, here we attach the LABEL string:

Screenshot from 2024-10-14 10-32-03

Pinning @giovannipizzi and @cpignedoli for some feedback on this, thanks!

from `relax: none` to `unrelaxed`
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 14, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 67.53%. Comparing base (e0b5b38) to head (9cacc10).
Report is 122 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #861   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   67.53%   67.53%           
=======================================
  Files          50       50           
  Lines        4620     4620           
=======================================
  Hits         3120     3120           
  Misses       1500     1500           
Flag Coverage Δ
python-3.11 67.53% <100.00%> (ø)
python-3.9 67.56% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@superstar54 superstar54 self-requested a review October 17, 2024 14:59
Copy link
Member

@superstar54 superstar54 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@mikibonacci mikibonacci merged commit 853ac8e into aiidalab:main Oct 18, 2024
7 checks passed
@mikibonacci mikibonacci deleted the fix/process-labels branch October 18, 2024 07:44
edan-bainglass added a commit to edan-bainglass/aiidalab-qe that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Improvement on process labels
2 participants