UCX: replace ucp_ep_flush() with ucp_ep_fence() - #219
Closed
michal-shalev wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
michal-shalev wants to merge 1 commit into
michal-shalev wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
michal-shalev
marked this pull request as draft
April 29, 2025 15:11
|
👋 Hi michal-shalev! Thank you for contributing to ai-dynamo/nixl. Your PR reviewers will review your contribution then trigger the CI to test your changes. 🚀 |
Contributor
|
@michal-shalev I originally used fence but was told that it’s not fully implanted (IIRC). Has that changed now? Is it part of new features in UCX 1.19? |
Contributor
Author
|
@artpol84 We're currently adding a new API: openucx/ucx#10665 |
Contributor
Author
|
Closing this PR, since openucx/ucx#10665 won't be relevant to NIXL. |
This was referenced Aug 24, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
WIP - Do not code review