Skip to content

Conversation

biswapanda
Copy link

No description provided.

@@ -0,0 +1,199 @@
# Multi-tenancy support for DynamoGraphDeployment
Copy link
Contributor

@nnshah1 nnshah1 Aug 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
# Multi-tenancy support for DynamoGraphDeployment
# Frontend Isolation in DynamoGraphDeployment

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

open to other thoughts here - but want to pull back from the notion of mult-tenancy and consider this more of isolation and reuse of nats / etcd for dynamo clusters.

we should break it into nats / etcd as part of the dynamo cloud instance?

So each k8s namespace has an operator and nats / etcd

every deployment within that share that nats and etcd

in order to deploy multiple isolated graphs within that deployment - we need hierarchical namspaces

I think we should motivate that last via customer requirement - is that needed? Likely yes -

@biswapanda biswapanda changed the title multi-tenancy Dynamo namespace based isolation for multi-tenancy support Sep 18, 2025
@biswapanda biswapanda changed the title Dynamo namespace based isolation for multi-tenancy support Dynamo namespace based isolation Sep 18, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants