fix: update k8s aic profile job arguments

[tedzhouhk]

Overview:

Details:

Where should the reviewer start?

Related Issues: (use one of the action keywords Closes / Fixes / Resolves / Relates to)

• closes GitHub issue: #xxx

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated internal benchmark configuration parameters to improve backend compatibility.

---

Note: This release contains no user-facing changes. Updates are limited to internal infrastructure and configuration improvements.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

A CLI flag in the Kubernetes job specification for the AIC backend profiler is renamed from --backend-version to --aic-backend-version, while retaining the version value 0.20.0.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
AIC Backend Job Configuration benchmarks/profiler/deploy/profile_sla_aic_job.yaml	Renamed CLI flag from --backend-version to --aic-backend-version for AIC backend configuration; version value remains 0.20.0

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐰 A flag renamed with care and grace,
From generic to backend-with-a-face,
The AIC version stays just the same,
A hop and a skip, configuration's the game!
✨ Clarity blooms in the YAML file,
Making configs more clear, all the while.

Pre-merge checks

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description Check	⚠️ Warning	The pull request description consists entirely of template placeholders with no substantive content provided. All four required sections (Overview, Details, Where should the reviewer start, and Related Issues) contain only template comments or placeholders like "- closes GitHub issue: #xxx" without any actual information about the changes, rationale, files to review, or related issue numbers. This represents a substantially incomplete description that fails to provide reviewers with necessary context about the pull request.	The author should fill in all required sections with concrete information: describe the purpose of the changes in the Overview section, explain what was changed and why in the Details section, identify which files need close review, and provide an actual GitHub issue number or remove the Related Issues section if not applicable. The description should help reviewers quickly understand the context and purpose of the pull request.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title Check	✅ Passed	The pull request title "fix: update k8s aic profile job arguments" is directly related to the changeset. The raw summary confirms that the change updates CLI flag arguments in a Kubernetes AIC profile job YAML file, specifically renaming the flag from --backend-version to --aic-backend-version. The title is specific and clear enough that a teammate reviewing the history would understand the primary change involves updating Kubernetes AIC profile job arguments.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)

benchmarks/profiler/deploy/profile_sla_aic_job.yaml (1)

1-66: Enhance the PR description to provide context for this change.

The PR description is incomplete and contains only placeholder text. This makes it impossible for reviewers to understand the motivation, scope, and impact of the flag rename. A clear description should address:

• Why is the flag being renamed? (clarification, alignment with naming conventions, part of a larger refactoring?)
• Is this a breaking change or is there a deprecation period?
• Are there related changes to the profiler code or other manifests?
• What testing was performed to validate the change?

Update the PR description to provide this context.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5e8dec7 and 69a6624.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• benchmarks/profiler/deploy/profile_sla_aic_job.yaml (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)

• GitHub Check: Build and Test - dynamo