test: Break parsers -> llm dependency

[grahamking]

The parsers crate is intended to be standalone, it cannot depend on llm. There was an integration test in there that used llm. This PR moves that test to the llm crate.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Removed a dev-only dependency from lib/parsers/Cargo.toml and deleted the test module content in lib/parsers/tests/mod.rs. No runtime dependencies or public APIs were altered.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Dependency cleanup lib/parsers/Cargo.toml	Deleted the [dev-dependencies] section, removing dynamo-llm = { workspace = true }.
Test removal lib/parsers/tests/mod.rs	Cleared file contents, removing SPDX header, docs, cfg(test), and the parallel_tool_call_integration test module declaration.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Poem

I trimmed the vines in nightly light,
A test hop gone, dev twigs pulled tight.
Thump-thump—clean paths for future runs,
Fewer crates, more rising suns.
Ears up, I commit with glee—
Less is more for this bunny spree. 🐇✨

Pre-merge checks

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description Check	⚠️ Warning	The pull request description does not follow the required template as it lacks the mandatory section headings such as Overview, Details, Where should the reviewer start, and Related Issues, and it does not provide specific guidance on where reviewers should focus. The content is useful but incomplete against the repository’s structured template.	Please update the description to match the repository template by adding an Overview summarizing the change, a Details section outlining specific code modifications, a Where should the reviewer start section pointing to key files, and a Related Issues section linking any relevant issue numbers.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title Check	✅ Passed	The title succinctly describes breaking the dependency from the parsers crate to the llm crate, which matches the main change of moving the integration test out of parsers. It is specific and clearly conveys the key purpose of the pull request without unnecessary information.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9bb2bc9 and 67ec066.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• Cargo.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• lib/parsers/Cargo.toml (0 hunks)
• lib/parsers/tests/mod.rs (0 hunks)

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)

• lib/parsers/tests/mod.rs
• lib/parsers/Cargo.toml

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (10)

• GitHub Check: trtllm (amd64)
• GitHub Check: vllm (amd64)
• GitHub Check: Build and Test - dynamo
• GitHub Check: tests (launch/dynamo-run)
• GitHub Check: tests (lib/bindings/python)
• GitHub Check: clippy (.)
• GitHub Check: tests (.)
• GitHub Check: tests (lib/runtime/examples)
• GitHub Check: clippy (launch/dynamo-run)
• GitHub Check: clippy (lib/bindings/python)

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[elyasmnvidian]

LGTM