Skip to content

Conversation

@grahamking
Copy link
Contributor

@grahamking grahamking commented Jul 8, 2025

We need a rust reviewers alias.

And add devops to the two entries that had only one person. We should't have single-owner entries, even though admins can always override.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated code ownership assignments for Rust files, the /examples/common/ directory, and CI/CD PowerShell workflow scripts.
    • Clarified comments regarding Rust file ownership.

We need a rust reviewers alias.

And add devops to the two entries that had only one person. We should't
have single-owner entries, even though admins can always override.
@grahamking grahamking requested review from a team and nnshah1 as code owners July 8, 2025 15:06
@github-actions github-actions bot added the chore label Jul 8, 2025
@grahamking grahamking enabled auto-merge (squash) July 8, 2025 15:06
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 8, 2025

Walkthrough

The CODEOWNERS file was updated to revise ownership assignments for various files and directories, including Rust files, example directories, and CI/CD PowerShell workflow scripts. Additional users and teams were added as owners, and a clarifying comment was modified. No application logic or exported entities were affected.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
CODEOWNERS Updated ownership assignments for Rust files, example directories, and workflow scripts; modified a clarifying comment.

Possibly related PRs

Poem

In the warren of CODEOWNERS, changes hop,
New teams and users join, non-stop!
Rusty carrots, workflows, too,
Devops bunnies join the crew.
With every nibble, ownership grows,
The garden of code, in neat little rows.
🥕


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 909a9a9 and 2007b58.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • CODEOWNERS (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
CODEOWNERS (1)
Learnt from: PeaBrane
PR: ai-dynamo/dynamo#1409
File: examples/router_standalone/worker.py:171-186
Timestamp: 2025-06-08T08:30:45.126Z
Learning: Example code in the `examples/` directory may intentionally use hard-coded values or simplified implementations that wouldn't be appropriate for production code, but are acceptable for demonstration and testing purposes.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
  • GitHub Check: Mirror Repository to GitLab
  • GitHub Check: Build and Test - vllm
  • GitHub Check: copyright-checks
  • GitHub Check: pre-commit
🔇 Additional comments (2)
CODEOWNERS (2)

21-21: Good catch adding DevOps as a secondary owner.

This removes the single-point-of-failure on /examples/common/. No further action required.


32-32: Consistent CI/CD ownership – looks correct.

Adding @ai-dynamo/Devops alongside the script author keeps workflow maintenance unblocked.

Comment on lines +6 to +8
# Rust - Keep these two the same. Or better make an alias like devops have.
*.rs @ryanolson @grahamking @paulhendricks @biswapanda @tmonty12 @guanluo @rmccorm4 @alec-flowers @kkranen @oandreeva-nv @ai-dynamo/Devops @jthomson04 @PeaBrane
Cargo.toml @ryanolson @grahamking @paulhendricks @biswapanda @tmonty12 @guanluo @rmccorm4 @kkranen @oandreeva-nv @ai-dynamo/Devops
Cargo.toml @ryanolson @grahamking @paulhendricks @biswapanda @tmonty12 @guanluo @rmccorm4 @alec-flowers @kkranen @oandreeva-nv @ai-dynamo/Devops @jthomson04 @PeaBrane
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot Jul 8, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider replacing the long per-user lists with a dedicated Rust team alias.

*.rs and Cargo.toml now repeat 14 individual handles plus @ai-dynamo/Devops.
Maintaining two hard-coded, duplicated lists is error-prone (easy to get out of sync, exceeds GitHub’s 15-reviewer suggestion limit, and forces manual updates when a member changes).

Option:

-*.rs          @ryanolson @grahamking … @PeaBrane
-Cargo.toml    @ryanolson @grahamking … @PeaBrane
+# Rust sources & manifests
+*.rs          @ai-dynamo/rust
+Cargo.toml    @ai-dynamo/rust

(where @ai-dynamo/rust is an org team that mirrors the current list).
This keeps the “two patterns, one owner list” rule in place while centralising membership to GitHub team management.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
# Rust - Keep these two the same. Or better make an alias like devops have.
*.rs @ryanolson @grahamking @paulhendricks @biswapanda @tmonty12 @guanluo @rmccorm4 @alec-flowers @kkranen @oandreeva-nv @ai-dynamo/Devops @jthomson04 @PeaBrane
Cargo.toml @ryanolson @grahamking @paulhendricks @biswapanda @tmonty12 @guanluo @rmccorm4 @kkranen @oandreeva-nv @ai-dynamo/Devops
Cargo.toml @ryanolson @grahamking @paulhendricks @biswapanda @tmonty12 @guanluo @rmccorm4 @alec-flowers @kkranen @oandreeva-nv @ai-dynamo/Devops @jthomson04 @PeaBrane
# Rust - Keep these two the same. Or better make an alias like devops have.
# Rust sources & manifests
*.rs @ai-dynamo/rust
Cargo.toml @ai-dynamo/rust
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In the CODEOWNERS file around lines 6 to 8, replace the repeated long lists of
individual user handles for `*.rs` and `Cargo.toml` with a single GitHub team
alias such as `@ai-dynamo/rust`. This involves creating a dedicated Rust team in
the GitHub organization that includes all current members, then updating both
lines to reference this team alias instead of listing each user individually.
This change centralizes membership management and avoids duplication.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, this would be ideal. How do I make that @ai-dynamo/rust "org team"?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@grahamking Here's how to create the @ai-dynamo/rust GitHub organization team:

Creating the GitHub Team

  1. Navigate to your organization: Go to https://github.com/ai-dynamo
  2. Access Teams: Click the "Teams" tab at the top of the organization page
  3. Create new team: Click the green "New team" button
  4. Configure the team:
    • Team name: rust (this creates the @ai-dynamo/rust handle)
    • Description: Something like "Rust code reviewers and maintainers"
    • Visibility: Choose "Visible" (recommended for code review teams)
    • Parent team: Leave empty unless you want to nest it under another team

Adding Members

After creating the team, add all current Rust reviewers:

You can:

  • Add individually: Search and add each member through the team's "Members" tab
  • Bulk invite: Use the "Add members" button and paste usernames

Permissions & Settings

  • Team permissions: No special repository permissions needed since CODEOWNERS handles review assignments
  • Team discussions: Enable if you want team-specific discussions
  • Team visibility: Keep as "Visible" so it can be referenced in CODEOWNERS

After Team Creation

Once the team exists, you can update the CODEOWNERS file to use:

*.rs       @ai-dynamo/rust
Cargo.toml @ai-dynamo/rust

The team will automatically handle member management, and you can add/remove people through GitHub's team interface instead of editing CODEOWNERS repeatedly.

@grahamking grahamking merged commit 24bede9 into main Jul 8, 2025
11 of 12 checks passed
@grahamking grahamking deleted the gk-codeowners-cargo branch July 8, 2025 15:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants