Conversation
Signed-off-by: Will Killian <wkillian@nvidia.com>
|
👋 Hi willkill07! Thank you for contributing to ai-dynamo/dynamo. Just a reminder: The 🚀 |
WalkthroughThe asynchronous method Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
|
@jain-ria can you check this should be awaited? |
|
Yes, there should be an await |
…mo#1642) Signed-off-by: Will Killian <wkillian@nvidia.com>
Overview:
This PR adds a missing await for an async function call. The embedded subprocess vllm-v1
clear_kv_blocksendpoint shouldawaitthe required call. I discovered this when trying to use the endpoint.Summary by CodeRabbit