Syllepsis #590
Merged
Syllepsis #590
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@mortberg It doesn't get much shorter than this (for me at least). I think it can be merged. |
mortberg
approved these changes
Aug 23, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR contains a proof of the syllepsis (
Eckmann-Hilton p q ≡ (Eckmann-Hilton q p) ⁻¹) for 3-loops p and q. I think the proof can be shortened a bit by usingEH-altas the main definition ofEckmann-Hilton(to avoid transports). I'll make this PR a draft for now and get back to it later.@ecavallo I remember you had another proof of
Eckmann-Hilton. It's possible that the same idea applied to your proof would make things shorter. Do you still have it somewhere? I seem to have lost the link.