Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix wrong entries in Standard Apple Glyph Ordering #727

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 6, 2019
Merged

Fix wrong entries in Standard Apple Glyph Ordering #727

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 6, 2019

Conversation

khaledhosny
Copy link
Collaborator

Three entries in that file are different from the table in Apple spec.

I have no idea what is the source of the difference (the file has them wrong since first commit), but it causes makeotf to fail compiling feature files to TTF fonts that reference glyphs using the Apple names.

Three entries in that file are different from the table in Apple spec:
https://developer.apple.com/fonts/TrueType-Reference-Manual/RM06/Chap6post.html

I have no idea what is the source of the difference (the file has them
wrong since first commit), but it causes makeotf to fail compiling
feature files to TTF fonts that reference glyphs using the Apple names.
@khaledhosny
Copy link
Collaborator Author

BTW, how do I run the test suite locally? (I added a test, but I couldn’t figure a way to run the tests).

@miguelsousa
Copy link
Member

how do I run the test suite locally?

  • cd to afdko directory
  • run pip install -r requirements_dev.txt
  • run pytest -v

These steps assume that you have the afdko installed from source. If you don't, run pip install .

@miguelsousa miguelsousa merged commit aa0407c into adobe-type-tools:develop Feb 6, 2019
@khaledhosny khaledhosny deleted the fix-standard-apple-glyph-names branch February 6, 2019 18:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants