-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 651
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
My curated issues on Source Han Serif v2.000 #121
Comments
Turns out that I missed serveral items in my last post. My apology. These should have belonged to section B. L. Addendum of glyph issues
|
Hi @tamcy! I hope you don't mind making me an addendum to your post. I don't want to flood the Issues section with more reports and my finding is similar to what you have discovered with other characters. Stroke Form Issues with the Component 將The stroke form of 將 is different for Japanese/Korean, Taiwanese, and Hong Kong versions. Because 將 is printed differently in the Taiwanese versions, it looked like all the glyphs with that component were redone to match. However, in the Hong Kong version, it looks like some characters with 將 were not redone if another character component was not different from the Japanese and/or Korean version. In other words, the stroke form is not consistent between all words with the 將 component in the Hong Kong version. Please refer to the picture above for examples. |
(Update 2022/1/28: These codepoints are now consolidated in #155 with other issues found in v2.001) |
Notes: E (臣) series: Those that do not have a CN glyph can use a mapping too (E9-E12, E14-15). J (centering): For simplified components (e.g. 纟讠), is it reasonable to follow HKSCS? Do other simplified components (e.g. 钅饣) need such adjustments too? Will Source Han Sans need this adjustments too?
L8 (U+8985 覅): Repeated with B12. Also, since 女 is different in CN and TW/HK but TW/HK both use horizontal stroke, just adjust the current TW/HK glyph will be good enough, i.e. no new glyph needed. (Edit: wrong code given, please check again) |
Actually, just noticed that the style of G (今) series is not mentioned anywhere in Taiwan MOE style (at least on documents available online), it only exist in fonts similar to the style of 亠 and 宀 touching the horizontal stroke. |
@tamcy For B6 is the TW glyph completely unacceptable because of the top of 分? At least for now we could map it to TW. Sans is the same with HK mapped to CN. |
@punchcutter Standards aside, either one is fine given this isn't a frequently used character. I'd suggest to leave it unchanged if it is going to be an interim solution, because the top-right stroke of TW's 分 is written as 乁, which isn't quite "native" to the HK version. But for CN's 掰, the left component can be seen in 拜, and its center component can be seen in 分, 扮 etc. |
I hope it isn't too late, I would like suggest to put the fixes of L4 (U+5DCD 巍) and L7 (U+8636 蘶) on hold first, because there are actually more codepoints/glyphs affected, to the extent that I think it might be better to have it categorized as a "acceptable unifiable difference". |
|
@tamcy Thanks for checking and closing some issues. And also for putting the marker on items addressed in this issue. That's very helpful. |
@punchcutter Don't mention it. Glad it helps! |
@tamcy just to check, you have marked B6 as done (❶ B6), but there is no mention of it in the README.pdf or updates in the font file. (@punchcutter please take note of B6 is not fixed yet) |
@NightFurySL2001 Thank you, I have removed the marker. |
Hi,
This is my curated list of issues found in Source Han Serif v2.000. They are mostly related to the newly added HK variant. Issues thought to be related to the build process migration as mentioned by the devs are skipped. Thank you!
💡: New glyph needed.
❶: Fixed in v2.001.
A. Issue with the masters
B. Glyph issues
uni74CAuE0101-JP
oruni74CA-TW
. Not sure if this is an isolated issue, still explicitly mention it here since it can be easily overlooked.uni5D4EuE0101-JP
oruni6A8EuE0101-JP
. I am not asking to change all of the related glyphs here (we can say the triangle-like decoration of the vertical line for this serif form is kind of buried into the horizontal line due to the limit amount of space), but for this particular codepoint, which shows the 禸 component alone, you may consider preserving this detail. (Edit 2021/11/2: U+2F71 should also remap to this new glyph.)B12(see L8 below)TW,HKU+8985 覅uni8985-TWThe first stroke of 女 is different.
uni9156uE0101-JP
. BTW,uni9156-JP
anduni9156-CN
look the same to me.uni9165uE0101-JP
.Note: For U+51F8 凸, U+51F9 凹, U+534D 卍 and U+9F0F 鼏, a correct version is found in the v1.x version of the font. Still, I strongly suggest to start over from the JP version for the first 3 glyphs because of the better design.
C. Stroke form issues with the component 聽
D. Stroke form issues with the component 貫
E. Stroke form issues with the component 臣
F. Stroke form issues with the component 㡀
This can be easily overlooked, so here they are:
G. Stroke form issues with the component 今
The form of 今 adapted by HK/TW is different from JP/KR/CN. This is unfortunate, I like the JP/KR form more, which should also be fine at least for HK (the HKSCS document is sometimes inconsistent). But anyway.
H. Stroke form issues with the component ⺮
Similarly, Source Han Serif adopts different design of the ⺮ component for TW/HK. Not a big deal, just for better consistency.
(No section I in this post)
J. Glyph position issues
This is related to the glyph positioning discrepancy between HKSCS and the current form. HKSCS mostly prefers centering the glyph to the em box. Depending on whether the current glyph position is insisted by the mapped region, new glyphs might be necessary.
K. Others
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: