-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
defer #403
Labels
enhancement
New feature or request
Milestone
Comments
odino
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 13, 2021
Sometimes it is very helpful to guarantee a certain function is executed regardless of what code path we take: you can use the `defer` keyword for this. ```py echo(1) defer echo(3) echo(2) ``` When you schedule a function to be deferred, it will executed right at the end of the current scope. A `defer` inside a function will then execute at the end of that function itself: ```py echo(1) f fn() { defer echo(3) echo(2) } fn() echo(4) ``` You can `defer` any callable: a function call, a method or even a system command. This can be very helpful if you need to run a cleanup function right before wrapping up with your code: ```sh defer `rm my-file.txt` "some text" > "my-file.txt" ... ... "some other text" >> "my-file.txt" ``` In this case, you will be guaranteed to execute the command that removes `my-file.txt` before the program closes. Be aware that code that is deferred does not have access to the return value of its scope, and will supress errors -- if a `defer` block messes up you're not going to see any error. This behavior is experimental, but we would most likely like to give this kind of control through [try...catch...finally](#118).
odino
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 24, 2021
Sometimes it is very helpful to guarantee a certain function is executed regardless of what code path we take: you can use the `defer` keyword for this. ```py echo(1) defer echo(3) echo(2) ``` When you schedule a function to be deferred, it will executed right at the end of the current scope. A `defer` inside a function will then execute at the end of that function itself: ```py echo(1) f fn() { defer echo(3) echo(2) } fn() echo(4) ``` You can `defer` any callable: a function call, a method or even a system command. This can be very helpful if you need to run a cleanup function right before wrapping up with your code: ```sh defer `rm my-file.txt` "some text" > "my-file.txt" ... ... "some other text" >> "my-file.txt" ``` In this case, you will be guaranteed to execute the command that removes `my-file.txt` before the program closes. Be aware that code that is deferred does not have access to the return value of its scope, and will supress errors -- if a `defer` block messes up you're not going to see any error. This behavior is experimental, but we would most likely like to give this kind of control through [try...catch...finally](#118).
odino
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 14, 2022
Sometimes it is very helpful to guarantee a certain function is executed regardless of what code path we take: you can use the `defer` keyword for this. ```py echo(1) defer echo(3) echo(2) ``` When you schedule a function to be deferred, it will executed right at the end of the current scope. A `defer` inside a function will then execute at the end of that function itself: ```py echo(1) f fn() { defer echo(3) echo(2) } fn() echo(4) ``` You can `defer` any callable: a function call, a method or even a system command. This can be very helpful if you need to run a cleanup function right before wrapping up with your code: ```sh defer `rm my-file.txt` "some text" > "my-file.txt" ... ... "some other text" >> "my-file.txt" ``` In this case, you will be guaranteed to execute the command that removes `my-file.txt` before the program closes. Be aware that code that is deferred does not have access to the return value of its scope, and will supress errors -- if a `defer` block messes up you're not going to see any error. This behavior is experimental, but we would most likely like to give this kind of control through [try...catch...finally](#118).
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
https://tour.golang.org/flowcontrol/12
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: