New declarative oMLX provider - #9177
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…o the existing llama_swap and lmstudio providers.
Contributor
Author
|
@DOsinga : better? :) |
Collaborator
|
thanks yeah, this is the way! |
DOsinga
approved these changes
May 13, 2026
github-merge-queue
Bot
removed this pull request from the merge queue due to no response for status checks
May 13, 2026
shafqatevo
pushed a commit
to shafqatevo/goose
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 7, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Add a new declarative provider for oMLX, similar to the existing llama_swap and lmstudio providers.
Testing
Manual testing. I configured the provider through the desktop UI, selected a model from the dynamic list, and ran some test prompts.
Related Issues
N/A
Screenshots/Demos (for UX changes)
Before:
After:
