Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FIX: Implemented Throttle Delay of 1 sec for Workflow Socket Messages #899

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

tahierhussain
Copy link
Contributor

What

Added throttling with a 1-second delay to handle workflow socket messages.

Why

Without throttling, excessive socket messages arriving within milliseconds caused recursive updates, leading to performance issues and unnecessary component re-renders.

How

Used lodash/throttle to buffer incoming workflow socket messages and process them at a controlled interval of 1 second.

Can this PR break any existing features. If yes, please list possible items. If no, please explain why. (PS: Admins do not merge the PR without this section filled)

Yes, this PR includes changes to the component that handles socket messages. So, there is a possibility of it breaking existing features.

Database Migrations

NA

Env Config

NA

Relevant Docs

NA

Related Issues or PRs

NA

Dependencies Versions

NA

Notes on Testing

NA

Screenshots

Checklist

I have read and understood the Contribution Guidelines.

@tahierhussain tahierhussain added the bug Something isn't working label Dec 17, 2024
@tahierhussain tahierhussain self-assigned this Dec 17, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

filepath function $$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{passed}}$$ SUBTOTAL
$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{worker/src/unstract/worker/clients/test\_docker.py}}$$ $$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{test\_logs}}$$ $$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{1}}$$ $$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{1}}$$
$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{worker/src/unstract/worker/clients/test\_docker.py}}$$ $$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{test\_cleanup}}$$ $$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{1}}$$ $$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{1}}$$
$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{worker/src/unstract/worker/clients/test\_docker.py}}$$ $$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{test\_cleanup\_skip}}$$ $$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{1}}$$ $$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{1}}$$
$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{worker/src/unstract/worker/clients/test\_docker.py}}$$ $$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{test\_client\_init}}$$ $$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{1}}$$ $$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{1}}$$
$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{worker/src/unstract/worker/clients/test\_docker.py}}$$ $$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{test\_get\_image\_exists}}$$ $$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{1}}$$ $$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{1}}$$
$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{worker/src/unstract/worker/clients/test\_docker.py}}$$ $$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{test\_get\_image}}$$ $$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{1}}$$ $$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{1}}$$
$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{worker/src/unstract/worker/clients/test\_docker.py}}$$ $$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{test\_get\_container\_run\_config}}$$ $$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{1}}$$ $$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{1}}$$
$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{worker/src/unstract/worker/clients/test\_docker.py}}$$ $$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{test\_get\_container\_run\_config\_without\_mount}}$$ $$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{1}}$$ $$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{1}}$$
$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{worker/src/unstract/worker/clients/test\_docker.py}}$$ $$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{test\_run\_container}}$$ $$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{1}}$$ $$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{1}}$$
$$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{TOTAL}}$$ $$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{9}}$$ $$\textcolor{#23d18b}{\tt{9}}$$

Copy link

Please retry analysis of this Pull-Request directly on SonarQube Cloud

@tahierhussain tahierhussain marked this pull request as draft December 17, 2024 20:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant