Skip to content

Conversation

@bpicolo
Copy link
Contributor

@bpicolo bpicolo commented May 12, 2015

This is ready once python-jsonschema/jsonschema#203 is in a release. Until then there's a bit of test flakiness for py3.

Fixes #10

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can use six.iteritems here : https://pythonhosted.org/six/#six.iteritems

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we can, but me and spatel talked and reckoned it's not worth it. Speed and memory difference at our scales more or less negligible

@analogue
Copy link
Contributor

@benp thanks for picking this up and making it happen. lgtm

@dnephin
Copy link
Contributor

dnephin commented May 13, 2015

lgtm (once the jsonschema dep is ready and tests are stable)

@bpicolo
Copy link
Contributor Author

bpicolo commented Jun 8, 2015

Bumped it and added a test difference for py3 for a new test : ) Should be good now methinks

@prat0318
Copy link
Contributor

prat0318 commented Jun 9, 2015

lgtm apart from the values concern.

@prat0318
Copy link
Contributor

prat0318 commented Jun 9, 2015

👍

prat0318 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2015
@prat0318 prat0318 merged commit 49a322f into Yelp:master Jun 9, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support for python 3.x

4 participants