-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Typography Panel in the Block Inspector for core/paragraph
never goes away even with all features disabled
#61231
Comments
I was able to reproduce it. I've set all the fields defined in the JSON Schema to empty or false, but I can't completely dismiss the panel. On the other hand, the Color panel and Dimension panel can be deleted. Below is the theme.json I used for testing. {
"$schema": "https://schemas.wp.org/trunk/theme.json",
"version": 3,
"settings": {
"appearanceTools": true,
"layout": {
"contentSize": "840px",
"wideSize": "1100px"
},
"color": {
"background": false,
"text": false,
"link": false
},
"typography": {
"fontSizes": [],
"customFontSize": false,
"defaultFontSizes": false,
"writingMode": false,
"dropCap": false,
"textDecoration": false,
"letterSpacing": false,
"textTransform": false,
"fontWeight": false,
"fontStyle": false,
"lineHeight": false,
"textAlign": false,
"textColumns": false,
"fontFamilies": [],
"fluid": false
},
"spacing": {
"margin": false,
"padding": false
}
}
} |
As a quick and dirty workaround I've come up with this for now: $css = <<<HTML
.typography-block-support-panel:has(.components-tools-panel-header + :empty:last-child) {
display: none;
}
HTML;
wp_add_inline_style('wp-edit-post', $css); What it basically does is hide the typography panel if the element following the panel header is empty and at the same time the last child which should only apply with this issue. |
I optimistically threw up a PR to (hopefully) address this: But only after digested @ellatrix's comments to not call Maybe |
This is the direction I was thinking: Might be way off as I didn't get time to look at all angles. Hope it helps someone though. If I get more time I can circle back. |
@ramonjd Thanks for the attempts! I think your second attempt, while interesting, also isn't an ideal solution. In contrast to the the other settings in there DropCap is a paragraph-specific setting and hence should live with the block and not the Typography Panel if you ask me. I thought about it some more and maybe the solution lies in stepping back and looking at the big picture: Why is the panel rendering in the first place if all it contains is a slot with So I looked into where this seems to be happening. It seems that there is a check for an empty slot, but it only checks for an empty array but doesn't care about what is in that array:
So maybe we should just deepen that check and also bail out if the slot only contains I then tried to go down the rabbit hole some more and see if that was a general problem with Slots that they do not filter out |
Fair point. There's an argument that other blocks could still use it, eg. Pullquote, but as it stands it's just for paragraph. If there's a way to handle it in the ToolsPanel, then it sounds like neater way! Good one!
I had a quick look and I think the array is populated with
if ( ! fills?.length && ! fills.every( ( fill ) => !! fill ) ) {
return null;
} Nope, I'm having a great day 😆 Checking for children on the fill doesn't appear to yield anything either. Might come back when my mind is fresher. |
Something like this might work, but I'm not sure. Basically checking for I think it's bad practice to render a component this way, but maybe only to check for null first? I'm out of ideas 🤣 Call DropCapEnabled as a function to check for `null` before rendering DropCapControldiff --git a/packages/block-editor/src/components/inspector-controls/fill.js b/packages/block-editor/src/components/inspector-controls/fill.js
index 456b33af91..c8cc86cb7b 100644
--- a/packages/block-editor/src/components/inspector-controls/fill.js
+++ b/packages/block-editor/src/components/inspector-controls/fill.js
@@ -37,6 +37,11 @@ export default function InspectorControlsFill( {
}
const context = useBlockEditContext();
+
+ if ( ! children ) {
+ return null;
+ }
+
const Fill = groups[ group ]?.Fill;
if ( ! Fill ) {
warning( `Unknown InspectorControls group "${ group }" provided.` );
diff --git a/packages/block-library/src/paragraph/edit.js b/packages/block-library/src/paragraph/edit.js
index 061cb672ae..c1706467c6 100644
--- a/packages/block-library/src/paragraph/edit.js
+++ b/packages/block-library/src/paragraph/edit.js
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ function hasDropCapDisabled( align ) {
return align === ( isRTL() ? 'left' : 'right' ) || align === 'center';
}
-function DropCapControl( { clientId, attributes, setAttributes } ) {
+function DropCapEnabled() {
// Please do not add a useSelect call to the paragraph block unconditionally.
// Every useSelect added to a (frequently used) block will degrade load
// and type performance. By moving it within InspectorControls, the subscription is
@@ -58,6 +58,10 @@ function DropCapControl( { clientId, attributes, setAttributes } ) {
return null;
}
+ return <></>;
+}
+
+function DropCapControl( { clientId, attributes, setAttributes } ) {
const { align, dropCap } = attributes;
let helpText;
@@ -132,11 +136,19 @@ function ParagraphBlock( {
</BlockControls>
) }
<InspectorControls group="typography">
- <DropCapControl
- clientId={ clientId }
- attributes={ attributes }
- setAttributes={ setAttributes }
- />
+ { /*
+ * Check return value of function before rendering JSX element to avoid rendering
+ * the inspector control, which checks for React children.
+ * Ideally we shouldn't call a React function component directly,
+ * so only render component if it passes.
+ */ }
+ { null !== DropCapEnabled() ? (
+ <DropCapControl
+ clientId={ clientId }
+ attributes={ attributes }
+ setAttributes={ setAttributes }
+ />
+ ) : null }
</InspectorControls>
<RichText
identifier="content"
|
@ramonjd Thank you for all your ideas🙇 If I understand correctly, the root cause of the empty Typography panel appearing is because the I'm also trying to find a way to solve the problem without making changes to the |
Thanks for looking. 🍺 This does work, but I haven't checked for side-effects, e.g., if the parent component were to call any of the same hooks so I don't think it's safe according to the warnings in that link I cited. Maybe the typography hook could mutate the props/attributes for the block? I'm getting desperate 🤣 |
Having talked to multiple people at contributor day at WCEU about this issue and nobody feeling capable of finding a clean solution I now do what I was recommended to do: @youknowriad can you have a look at this issue please? |
I went through the discussions here and I'd say that if we're trying to solve a solution in terms of React and Slot/Fill, we're probably going in the wrong direction to be honest. Slots in general shouldn't actually care about what the Fills render. Especially important for performance as well as otherwise we would risk re-rendering a lot more than needed when updating just a small area (fill). There are options to solve this issue though:
That said, in terms of extensibility and DevX, it's not really a great DevX to have to disable all typography controls one by one if we want to remove the panel entirely. Maybe we should think about having a way to disable it all at once with a |
Thanks for your fast response @youknowriad! To be honest I am stunned that if I read that right you're seeing the CSS solution as the only viable one. To me this sounds really messy and somewhat like an architectural flaw. Concerning the batch removal I think your proposal for a general off-switch is nice, but to be honest probably beyond the scope of this issue. |
In this particular case, there's an easy solution (to revert to the previous check) before I don't think there's any architectural flaw here. There's just competing requirements:
|
Well I am not going to waste anybody's time here arguing about whether such a CSS fix should ever be an acceptable solution to something that should never be rendered, I guess you can read my point of view between the lines. 😉 Returning to constructively moving this issue forward: I can try crafting a more general CSS selector, but I'm not really sure where those should then be best added in the overall codebase so this can move on towards a PR. Any pointers? |
Somewhere in the styles of this component probably https://github.com/WordPress/gutenberg/tree/trunk/packages/components/src/tools-panel |
Until a solution is ready, can this at least be added as a notice in the documentation? I spent a solid chunk of time debugging what I thought was a mistake on my end because I didn't know this was a known issue. Thank you! |
Description
If you disable all typography features the corresponding panel should completely disappear. Unfortunately for paragraph blocks this never happens.
The reason for this is that the
<DropCapControl>
always triggers the rendering of the panel. This comes from the fact that if you add an<InspectorControl>
with a group it renders the panel even if the only content isnull
. So to conditionally render the control you must not even return the<InspectorControl>
.But this PR moved the check inside the
<InspectorControl>
dc95863#diff-6fffd1b2241c181cc9077eb4508a03fe473b7bf22078a72ba9b2b2dfebd8fb92L101-R134This makes this a regression in WP 6.5.
Step-by-step reproduction instructions
theme.json
You'll also be fighting against the fact that the font sizes setting doesn't fully go away. I used this workaround to fix this first:
To further demonstrate that this is the problem you can use this code to trigger the same problem with any other block that would normally not show the Typography Panel if all features are disabled. I used the
core/heading
block in the following code:You'll notice that I added an
<InspectorControl>
with onlynull
as content but the panel still renders.Screenshots, screen recording, code snippet
Environment info
WordPress 6.5 with and without Gutenberg 18.2.0.
Please confirm that you have searched existing issues in the repo.
Yes
Please confirm that you have tested with all plugins deactivated except Gutenberg.
Yes
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: