Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Split inspector: Add pointer to indicate the change. #47410

Closed
jasmussen opened this issue Jan 25, 2023 · 8 comments · Fixed by #47670
Closed

Split inspector: Add pointer to indicate the change. #47410

jasmussen opened this issue Jan 25, 2023 · 8 comments · Fixed by #47670
Assignees

Comments

@jasmussen
Copy link
Contributor

Having had a singular inspector for a while, the split into settings and styles is likely going to take a little bit of re-learning. We can mitigate that with a pointer:

Pointer message shown at the bottom of the default Styles tab

Looking for other block settings?
They moved to the Settings tab.

This would be a dismissible first-run message shown at the bottom of the default Styles tab.

Note: It's important this pointer is built as a reusable component to potentially be leveraged elsewhere for similar informative purposes. As such it would be a generic interface not tied specifically to the split inspector, even if that would be where we use it first.

@jasmussen jasmussen added the Needs Dev Ready for, and needs developer efforts label Jan 25, 2023
@ndiego ndiego moved this to ❓ Triage in WordPress 6.2 Editor Tasks Jan 25, 2023
@kathrynwp
Copy link

kathrynwp commented Jan 25, 2023

Thank you for adding this signpost for users, it's going to be appreciated.

Users may not immediately figure out where the referenced Settings tab is. Could we add an additional line like:

Looking for other block settings?
They moved to the Settings tab:
click the gear icon at the top right.

Or whatever term is standard to account for touch devices as well.

@annezazu annezazu moved this from ❓ Triage to 📥 Todo in WordPress 6.2 Editor Tasks Jan 25, 2023
@richtabor
Copy link
Member

Just noting that the Group block in Twenty Twenty Three will look more like this out of the box.

Maybe the pointer still works inline at the foot? Or perhaps a more tooltip like pointer would work better, pointing to the settings icon?

Frame 1

@jasmussen
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yep, good note. I think it might still make sense, because if you're looking for something specific, you might first be looking through all those controls and scroll, then when you get to the bottom you see the message. Maybe fine?

@talldan
Copy link
Contributor

talldan commented Jan 30, 2023

Note: It's important this pointer is built as a reusable component to potentially be leveraged elsewhere for similar informative purposes. As such it would be a generic interface not tied specifically to the split inspector, even if that would be where we use it first.

@jasmussen This looks quite a lot like a notice and serves a similar purpose:
https://wordpress.github.io/gutenberg/?path=/story/components-notice--default&args=isDismissible:true;status:warning

Maybe that component can be used for this? It could have a different 'status'.

@jasmussen
Copy link
Contributor Author

It does feel like the same notice, yes, but perhaps not entirely. Notices when used above the editor canvas in the editor are visually somewhat out of date and could look similar to this or snackbars, and I think there's an open question on whether we need them at all. Probably? But if we do need them, it does put some limitations on what we can do with the design, unless we have a variant that looks entirely different. Mostly, we should avoid an orange notice in the inspector. Not sure whether that's best done as a notice variant or otherwise.

But to be fair, it really would be nice to update the appearance of notices — for contrast warnings etc. There's no reason they couldn't look like this.

@richtabor
Copy link
Member

@jasmussen With the switch to having "Settings" as the default tab #47575 (for blocks that have settings) do you still think this is necessary — but swapped context-wise to render on the Settings tab, pointing out the appearance tab?

CleanShot 2023-01-30 at 12 06 04

Note: This pointer should only render if the tabs are available, as with #47463 done - we don't always have them.

@jasmussen
Copy link
Contributor Author

The text would have to change, because you might then be wondering, "where did my font size go"?

I don't think this is an urgent thing, and if we find it to not be necessary, all the better 👍 👍

@talldan
Copy link
Contributor

talldan commented Feb 2, 2023

But to be fair, it really would be nice to update the appearance of notices — for contrast warnings etc. There's no reason they couldn't look like this.

Probably one consideration for refactoring notices is whether the gray background color has enough contrast for a wide array of use cases. That may be the reason the other notices have a stronger contrast. Especially given that plugins would be using that component in a wp-admin type UI, which has a very similar shade of gray as its background.

I see there are a couple of other 'pointer' issues (#47583, #47656), so it'll be interesting to see how the design for those works, and whether there's consistency.

@talldan talldan self-assigned this Feb 2, 2023
@talldan talldan removed the Needs Dev Ready for, and needs developer efforts label Feb 2, 2023
@talldan talldan moved this from 📥 Todo to 🏗️ In Progress in WordPress 6.2 Editor Tasks Feb 2, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added the [Status] In Progress Tracking issues with work in progress label Feb 2, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 🏗️ In Progress to ✅ Done in WordPress 6.2 Editor Tasks Feb 4, 2023
@priethor priethor removed the [Status] In Progress Tracking issues with work in progress label May 17, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
No open projects
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants