Compilation: use mtime for timestamp macro #791
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
danielsan901998
force-pushed
the
timestamp
branch
2 times, most recently
from
e06eac3
to
7bff903
Compare
danielsan901998
force-pushed
the
timestamp
branch
from
7bff903
to
c80e537
Compare
Vexu
approved these changes
Oct 18, 2024
Co-authored-by: Veikka Tuominen <[email protected]>
|
Changes applied |
|
Thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
resolve #711
Added a new argument to generateBuiltinMacros to pass an optional timestamp that is used in the case of not having a valid epoch passed as environment variable, to generate the timestamp from a path a new function called generateBuiltinMacrosFromPath is created and is used in Driver for each source file instead of having the same builtin.
Changed generateDateAndTime to make the timestamp argument optional, since the stat can fail, and following GCC behavior it will expand timestamp to "??? ??? ?? ??:??:?? ????"