-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 151
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
drop swizzle API in favor of a new permutation generalization #26
Labels
Comments
mattkretz
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 4, 2015
Swizzles are not the right approach. We rather want to have powerful general permutation capabilities and leave optimization to swizzle instructions up to the compiler. Refs: gh-26 Signed-off-by: Matthias Kretz <[email protected]>
mattkretz
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 12, 2015
Swizzles are not the right approach. We rather want to have powerful general permutation capabilities and leave optimization to swizzle instructions up to the compiler. Refs: gh-26 Signed-off-by: Matthias Kretz <[email protected]>
mattkretz
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 27, 2015
Refs: gh-26 Signed-off-by: Matthias Kretz <[email protected]>
mattkretz
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 29, 2015
Swizzles are not the right approach. We rather want to have powerful general permutation capabilities and leave optimization to swizzle instructions up to the compiler. Refs: gh-26 Signed-off-by: Matthias Kretz <[email protected]>
mattkretz
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 29, 2015
Refs: gh-26 Signed-off-by: Matthias Kretz <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: