Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Literature – Idempotents in Intensional Type Theory #1160

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
Aug 21, 2024

Conversation

fredrik-bakke
Copy link
Collaborator

@fredrik-bakke fredrik-bakke commented Aug 2, 2024

Adds a literature file for the article Idempotents in Intensional Type Theory by Shulman. Most of sections 1-3, 5, and 9 are formalized.

#1103 #1055

@fredrik-bakke fredrik-bakke added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation foundation labels Aug 2, 2024
src/literature.lagda.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@fredrik-bakke fredrik-bakke marked this pull request as ready for review August 5, 2024 10:35
Copy link
Collaborator

@VojtechStep VojtechStep left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👌

fredrik-bakke and others added 2 commits August 17, 2024 23:12
Co-authored-by: Vojtěch Štěpančík <[email protected]>
@fredrik-bakke
Copy link
Collaborator Author

merging time? 🥹👉👈

@VojtechStep VojtechStep merged commit da7a12c into UniMath:master Aug 21, 2024
4 checks passed
@VojtechStep
Copy link
Collaborator

👉😎👉

@fredrik-bakke fredrik-bakke deleted the literature-idempotents-split branch August 21, 2024 20:26
morphismz pushed a commit to morphismz/agda-unimath that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2024
Adds a literature file for the article _Idempotents in Intensional Type
Theory_ by Shulman. Most of sections 1-3, 5, and 9 are formalized.

UniMath#1103 UniMath#1055
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation foundation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants