Skip to content

Remove explicit Microsoft.SourceLink.GitHub package reference#31

Merged
Tyrrrz merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
copilot/remove-source-link-package
Mar 2, 2026
Merged

Remove explicit Microsoft.SourceLink.GitHub package reference#31
Tyrrrz merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
copilot/remove-source-link-package

Conversation

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI commented Mar 2, 2026

Since .NET 8 SDK, Source Link support for GitHub-hosted repositories is built into the SDK — the Microsoft.SourceLink.GitHub package is redundant.

Changes

  • Cogwheel/Cogwheel.csproj — removed PackageReference for Microsoft.SourceLink.GitHub
  • Directory.Packages.props — removed corresponding PackageVersion entry
Original prompt

Background

Since .NET 8 SDK, Source Link support is built directly into the SDK for GitHub-hosted repositories. It is no longer necessary to explicitly reference the Microsoft.SourceLink.GitHub NuGet package.

Task

Remove all explicit references to Microsoft.SourceLink.GitHub from the project.

In Cogwheel/Cogwheel.csproj, remove the following line:

<PackageReference Include="Microsoft.SourceLink.GitHub" PrivateAssets="all" />

If there is a corresponding PackageVersion entry for Microsoft.SourceLink.GitHub in Directory.Packages.props (if that file exists), remove that entry too.

Do not make any other changes. The built-in SDK Source Link support will take over automatically.

This pull request was created from Copilot chat.


💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.

Co-authored-by: Tyrrrz <1935960+Tyrrrz@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Remove explicit references to Microsoft.SourceLink.GitHub Remove explicit Microsoft.SourceLink.GitHub package reference Mar 2, 2026
@Tyrrrz Tyrrrz marked this pull request as ready for review March 2, 2026 12:04
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings March 2, 2026 12:04
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Mar 2, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 93.33%. Comparing base (41a67a0) to head (7f66196).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #31   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.33%   93.33%           
=======================================
  Files           1        1           
  Lines          60       60           
  Branches        9        9           
=======================================
  Hits           56       56           
  Misses          2        2           
  Partials        2        2           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Removes an explicit Source Link provider package that’s redundant with modern .NET SDKs, simplifying the build/package dependency set.

Changes:

  • Removed the centralized PackageVersion entry for Microsoft.SourceLink.GitHub.
  • Removed the PackageReference to Microsoft.SourceLink.GitHub from the Cogwheel project.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
Directory.Packages.props Drops the centrally-managed version for Microsoft.SourceLink.GitHub.
Cogwheel/Cogwheel.csproj Removes the explicit Microsoft.SourceLink.GitHub package reference.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants