Consecutives \t are not handled correctly

[matteosaporiti]

If I try to apply a motion tracking to something like

{\blur10\t(0,600,\blur7)\t(600,1000,0.5,\blur3)\t(1000,3000,0.65,\blur0.6)}

the result comes out wrong, because \t is always handled like is starting from the "static" value and not from the end of the previous \t.
This means that when motion tracked the type goes like:
blur10->blur7 | blur10->blur->3 | blur10->blur0.6

[torque]

This is a known problem with the transform interpolation. This line should be handled properly if you turn off the Interp. transforms option. This will be fixed at some point before 1.0.0 final.

Going to leave the issue open as a reminder. Thanks.

[torque]

Closing as fixed with beta 4. Feel free to reopen if you encounter problems with the fix.