test: cover DeepSeek max token limits - #38
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Vasanthdev2004
marked this pull request as ready for review
April 1, 2026 14:03
euxaristia
pushed a commit
to euxaristia/openclaude
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 13, 2026
test: cover DeepSeek max token limits
reymaster
pushed a commit
to reymaster/openclaude
that referenced
this pull request
May 5, 2026
test: cover DeepSeek max token limits
thedeveloloper
pushed a commit
to thedeveloloper/openclaude
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 8, 2026
test: cover DeepSeek max token limits
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
deepseek-chatcontext window and max output token limitsCLAUDE_CODE_MAX_OUTPUT_TOKENSvalues still clamp to DeepSeek's native8192limitWhy
Issue #35 reported
deepseek-chatfailing withInvalid max_tokenson the DeepSeek OpenAI-compatible endpoint.The runtime cap logic is already present on
main, but it was easy for this behavior to look unresolved without focused coverage. This PR locks the behavior down so provider-specific limits for DeepSeek stay protected against future regressions.Impact
Validation
bun test src/utils/context.test.tsbun run test:provider