Fix SSL verification in coveralls. #377
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r1. Comments from Reviewable |
|
Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r1. Comments from Reviewable |
iphydf
force-pushed
the
unverified-ssl
branch
2 times, most recently
from
5a910d7
to
9ea9cee
Compare
iphydf
changed the title
pothitos
added a commit
to pothitos/naxos
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 2, 2017
Used the solution introduced in TokTok/c-toxcore#377.
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We really don't care about coveralls doing its call to the right server.
The worst that can happen is that someone MITMs our coverage analysis,
which we already don't care about much at this point.
This change is