cleanup: Replace pointer arithmetic with explicit &arr[i].
#2675
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
It's equivalent, but MISRA requires the latter form. It helps readability in some cases where the type of the overloaded `operator+` is unclear.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2675 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 73.70% 73.75% +0.05%
==========================================
Files 148 148
Lines 30482 30482
==========================================
+ Hits 22466 22482 +16
+ Misses 8016 8000 -16 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
JFreegman
approved these changes
Feb 10, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status:complete! 1 of 1 approvals obtained
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It's equivalent, but MISRA requires the latter form. It helps readability in some cases where the type of the overloaded
operator+is unclear.This change is