Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: Don't rely on tox_dispatch passing tox in tests. #2644

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 4, 2024

Conversation

iphydf
Copy link
Member

@iphydf iphydf commented Feb 4, 2024

This frees up the dispatcher from having to know that Tox * exists.


This change is Reviewable

@iphydf iphydf added this to the v0.2.19 milestone Feb 4, 2024
@iphydf iphydf marked this pull request as ready for review February 4, 2024 00:07
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 4, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (34df938) 73.72% compared to head (e202341) 73.62%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2644      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   73.72%   73.62%   -0.10%     
==========================================
  Files         148      148              
  Lines       30419    30419              
==========================================
- Hits        22425    22395      -30     
- Misses       7994     8024      +30     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@JFreegman JFreegman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed 20 of 20 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! 1 of 1 approvals obtained

This frees up the dispatcher from having to know that `Tox *` exists.
@iphydf iphydf merged commit e202341 into TokTok:master Feb 4, 2024
59 of 60 checks passed
@iphydf iphydf deleted the dispatch-no-tox branch February 4, 2024 20:18
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants