Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cleanup: Use explicit 0 instead of PACKET_ID_PADDING. #2593

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 24, 2024

Conversation

iphydf
Copy link
Member

@iphydf iphydf commented Jan 24, 2024

Calling it a packet ID is a lie, and we'd rather "memzero" than memset with some named value that happens to be 0.


This change is Reviewable

Calling it a packet ID is a lie, and we'd rather "memzero" than memset
with some named value that happens to be 0.
@iphydf iphydf added this to the v0.2.19 milestone Jan 24, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 24, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (6370d0f) 73.68% compared to head (a7258e4) 73.60%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2593      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   73.68%   73.60%   -0.08%     
==========================================
  Files         148      148              
  Lines       30342    30342              
==========================================
- Hits        22357    22333      -24     
- Misses       7985     8009      +24     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@JFreegman JFreegman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed 2 of 2 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! 1 of 1 approvals obtained

@iphydf iphydf merged commit a7258e4 into TokTok:master Jan 24, 2024
56 checks passed
@iphydf iphydf deleted the padding branch January 24, 2024 17:31
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants