-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 92
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix another legacy Python compatibility issue #239
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent update focuses on enhancing compatibility with Python standards by refining the import strategy in the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- thriftpy2/hook.py (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 5
thriftpy2/hook.py (5)
- 15-15: The import of
importlib.util
is correctly placed within the version check for Python 3.4 and above, ensuring compatibility with both legacy and modern Python versions. This is a good practice for maintaining backward compatibility.- 15-15: The import of
importlib.abc
is also correctly scoped within the Python version check. This ensures that the code only attempts to useimportlib.abc
where it is available, aligning with the goal of maintaining compatibility across Python versions.- 3-18: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [17-28]
The
ThriftImporter
class is correctly defined as aMetaPathFinder
for Python versions 3.4 and above. This use ofimportlib.abc.MetaPathFinder
andimportlib.util.spec_from_loader
is appropriate for the dynamic loading of modules and adheres to modern Python standards for module import and loading. However, it's important to ensure that theThriftLoader
class, referenced inspec_from_loader
, is properly defined and compatible with the expected interface.
- 3-18: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [34-44]
For Python versions below 3.4, the
ThriftImporter
class is defined without extendingimportlib.abc.MetaPathFinder
, which is appropriate given the version compatibility requirements. However, it's crucial to ensure that the methodsfind_module
andload_module
are correctly implemented and tested across the supported legacy Python versions to prevent runtime errors.
- 3-18: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [46-54]
The installation and removal of the import hook using
install_import_hook
andremove_import_hook
functions are correctly implemented. These functions manipulatesys.meta_path
to add or remove the custom importer, which is a standard approach for customizing module import behavior in Python. It's important to ensure that these functions are called appropriately within the application to activate and deactivate the custom import logic as needed.
Summary by CodeRabbit