Skip to content

model: Muse Glimmer support (cherry-pick upstream 62bf73d25 / PR #26841) - #290

Merged
TheTom merged 1 commit into
feature/turboquant-kv-cachefrom
muse-glimmer-support
Aug 10, 2026
Merged

model: Muse Glimmer support (cherry-pick upstream 62bf73d25 / PR #26841)#290
TheTom merged 1 commit into
feature/turboquant-kv-cachefrom
muse-glimmer-support

Conversation

@TheTom

@TheTom TheTom commented Aug 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Cherry-picks upstream 62bf73d25 (ggml-org#26841, merged 2026-08-10) onto the turboquant branch so the fork can serve Meta's Muse Glimmer 30B and its DFlash drafter.

Why

The fork could not load muse_glimmer at all, so TurboQuant KV cache could not be tested against it. This unblocks that, and the KV testing is the actual motivation.

Conflict resolution, one hunk

tools/mtmd/clip-impl.h conflicted. Upstream added PROJECTOR_TYPE_QWEN3TTS_SPKENC and PROJECTOR_TYPE_QWEN3TTS_GEN between this branch's merge base and the Muse commit; the fork does not carry those.

Resolved by keeping only PROJECTOR_TYPE_MUSE_GLIMMER and its name-map entry. Importing the two Qwen3-TTS enum values without the code that implements them would add half-supported types for no benefit. Everything else auto-merged, including common/speculative.cpp, which was the hunk most likely to conflict given this branch's own MTP work.

Verified

  • Builds clean on CUDA sm_121 (-DGGML_CUDA=ON -DCMAKE_CUDA_ARCHITECTURES=121), llama-server, llama-cli and llama-perplexity targets.
  • Serves muse-glimmer-30B-kquant-dynamic.gguf + mmproj-kquant.gguf and answers correctly.
  • Used to run a TurboQuant KV sweep on the GB10: perplexity across f16 / turbo4 / turbo3 and two asymmetric combos, plus a long-context needle ladder. turbo4 came in at +0.23% PPL against f16 at 8192 ctx.

Not verified

  • No Metal or Vulkan build tested.
  • Vision path loads (mmproj) and answers, but the mtmd changes were not exercised beyond that.
  • This is a straight cherry-pick, not a rebase of the branch onto current upstream master.

* Get started with Onyx

* Add architecture

* Skip keys handled in super()

* Loading tensors

* Shorten

* Graph

* Apply suggestion from @pcuenca

* Remove norm now embedding in transformers weights

* Add eot

* Explicit output_multiplier

* Handle post_norm_eps

* No super call; unhardcode eot.

The pattern `self._set_vocab_gpt2()` seems preferred throughout the
codebase, and it allows `set_vocab()` to be called from a different part
of the Python class hierarchy: the drafter model converter that we may
need eventually.

* Register for drafting

* DFlash: inherit rope type from the linked target.

Another option would be to store it in the gguf file itself.

* mmproj conversion

Note: some fields to be renamed after the implementation works. We are
keeping compatibility with the reference Meta gguf for testing purposes.

* "clip" header declarations

* Load mmproj

* Pre-processing

* Graph

* Go back to using delimiters.

Otherwise our generations are worse.

Transformers does not use them. We need to trace inputs to verify
whether they are equivalent.

* downsample_factor -> merge_size

* Add vision graph

lol, forgot from a previous commit

* Additional renames, align with llama.cpp / transformers

* Prefer _size instead of independent _h and _w

* Fix token layout

Co-authored-by: Young Han <younghan@fb.com>

* onyx: bring the chat parser onto the onyx branch

common/chat.cpp on this branch has no Onyx handling, so a converted model
serves malformed chat: the assistant preamble leaks into content
("to=self<|message|>...") and tool calls fail with

    HTTP 500 "The model produced output that does not match the expected
              peg-native format"

common_chat_params_init_onyx exists on onyx-fair-patch, added there by
8bb73dd3d. It was never on this branch, so this is not a regression --
the two lines developed independently.

The code here is taken verbatim from that commit. It is the clean side of
`git merge origin/onyx-fair-patch`: chat.cpp is one of the files that
merges without conflict. The full merge is not viable -- it produces 13
conflicts, including add/add on conversion/onyx.py and src/models/onyx.cpp
where the q_norm-folding and metadata-scale approaches contradict each
other, and #4/#7 are stacked on this branch's side of that.

Verified on this branch: builds with 0 errors, converts an Onyx checkpoint,
and serving it gives "4" for "What is 2+2?" plus a correct
get_weather {"city":"Paris"} tool call, where the unported branch gives the
two failures above.

No converter or runtime changes are included, so this should not interact
with the q_norm work.

Co-authored-by: Beto de Paola <betodepaola@meta.com>

* Less params, bilinear pos-emb interpolation as a graph op instead of CPU

* Map to symbolic V_MMPROJ instead of strings

* Make a couple params explicit

* Patchify via build_inp()

* No param for rope_theta

* Small cleanup

* Restore blank line

* Unpermute, to adapt to the latest transformers checkpoint

* Apply norm after token embeddings

This follows the latest transformers approach.

* Remove duplicated function

* build_vit

* onyx: use the model rope theta on sliding-window layers

* DFlash: conversion from transformers drafter

* Revert rope_type derivation from target

NOTE: this breaks compatibility with Meta's distributed DFlash GGUFs, as
the Q/K are stored in "NEOX" (rotated half) format, like in
transformers.

* Apply suggestion from @pcuenca

* Set model type

* Remove comment that will become obsolete

* Hardcode post_norm_rms_eps instead of new param

* Derive SWA+RoPE pattern from gguf array or scalar

* Fix model type <-> number of layers

* Reorder

* Rename

* Fix typo

* DFlash: seed the draft KV cache from multimodal embedding batches

`common_speculative_impl_draft_dflash::process()` returned early on any batch carrying embeddings, so an image prefill never had its target-layer features fused through the DFlash encoder and injected into the draft's KV cache. That left a hole spanning the image's positions, and the next injection at a post-image position failed to initialize its batch:

```
decoding image batch 1/1, n_tokens_batch = 256
decode: failed to initialize batch
llama_decode: failed to decode, ret = -1
process: llama_decode(ctx_dft) failed rc=-1 (n_tokens=17, offset=0)
srv decode: failed to process speculative batch
```

Every image request with `--spec-type draft-dflash` failed with HTTP 500. Text-only was unaffected, since those batches carry token ids and were let through.

Restore the earlier condition, which admits a batch that is either tokens or embeddings and skips only the degenerate neither/both cases. The rest of `process()` is already layout-agnostic -- it gathers features via `llama_get_embeddings_layer_inp()` and indexes `batch_in.pos[]` / `batch_in.seq_id[]`, none of which assume token ids -- so this is the whole fix.

Validated against `muse-glimmer-30B-bf16.gguf` + `mmproj-muse-glimmer-30B-bf16.gguf` + a DFlash draft head, on an image describe-the-shapes request:

- before: HTTP 500, `failed to process speculative batch`
- after: HTTP 200, draft acceptance 0.34012 (167 accepted / 491 generated), mean len 3.04

Output equivalence holds, which is the property that matters: at temperature 0 the drafted response is byte-identical to the same request served with no draft attached (1213/1213 chars), so the draft is drafting correctly through the image context rather than merely not crashing.

* Conversion: prefer rewrite to mapping

* Revert "Conversion: prefer rewrite to mapping"

This reverts commit a92d0ac.

* fix lint

* sliding_window metadata is not optional

* disable state save/load

* Apply suggestion from @pcuenca

---------

Co-authored-by: Young Han <younghan@fb.com>
Co-authored-by: Beto de Paola <betodepaola@meta.com>
Co-authored-by: Daniel Han <michaelhan2050@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: ruanrms <ruanslv@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Xuan Son Nguyen <son@huggingface.co>
Co-authored-by: Sigbjørn Skjæret <sigbjorn.skjaeret@huggingface.co>
@TheTom
TheTom merged commit 2168b0c into feature/turboquant-kv-cache Aug 10, 2026
5 of 26 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants