Add find_task_logs function

[nadouani]

Request Type

Feature Request

Problem Description

This function allows searching for task logs

[jnahorny]

@nadouani I've found this issue when searching for a solution, after I've discovered get_task_logs() method only returns 10 results, with no option to change it.

I already wrote the version that behaves just like get_case_tasks() (allows you to pass params and additional query criteria).
I would happily sent it as a pull request, just want to discuss one thing -- name of the method.
I believe this should replace existing get_task_logs() implementation, for the sake of naming consistency.
I mean, if get_case_tasks() returns all the tasks, why does get_task_logs() not return all the logs? I'd say it's even more useful, as I think there's higher probability of having > 10 log entries in a task, than having > 10 tasks in the case. Isn't it?
Also, this woudn't break compatibility, because if you don't provide params, nor query, you'd call the method exactly the way it is now.

But, if you prefer other name (find_task_logs()?), and you want to keep existing get_task_logs() as is, I'm OK with that as well.

Thank you!

[jnahorny]

I had to delete the original PR, because I've messed something up when doing the rebase. This issue is now addressed in the following PR: #200

[nadouani]

Hello @jnahorny #200 is perfect.

could you provide two functions:

• find_tasks_logs(**attributes): generic function to search for logs
• get_task_logs(task_id, **attributes) that calls find_tasks_logs by specifying the ParentId` criteria

If you don't have time, I can make it too, using your PR.

[jnahorny]

Hello @jnahorny #200 is perfect.

could you provide two functions:

• find_tasks_logs(**attributes): generic function to search for logs
• get_task_logs(task_id, **attributes) that calls find_tasks_logs by specifying the ParentId criteria

If you don't have time, I can make it too, using your PR.

@nadouani It's not that I don't have time, but I'm not sure how to do it. I guess it would be probably faster for you to do it, instead of explaining to me how to do it. But I'm open to both scenarios :)

[nadouani]

Sounds good, I'll do it using your PR ;)

[jnahorny]

Sounds good, I'll do it using your PR ;)

Thank you! I can't wait for it to be in production!

[nadouani]

@jnahorny take a look to b009365 to understand what I meant.

Thanks for your contribution