Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update show_response.py #12401

Closed

Conversation

yuvashrikarunakaran
Copy link

@yuvashrikarunakaran yuvashrikarunakaran commented Dec 2, 2024

The method set_coefficients takes two lists as parameters: one for a_coeffs and one for b_coeffs. If a_coeffs and b_coeffs are arrays or require specific formats, update accordingly.

Describe your change:

  • Add an algorithm?
  • Fix a bug or typo in an existing algorithm?
  • Add or change doctests? -- Note: Please avoid changing both code and tests in a single pull request.
  • Documentation change?

Checklist:

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized.
  • I know that pull requests will not be merged if they fail the automated tests.
  • This PR only changes one algorithm file. To ease review, please open separate PRs for separate algorithms.
  • All new Python files are placed inside an existing directory.
  • All filenames are in all lowercase characters with no spaces or dashes.
  • All functions and variable names follow Python naming conventions.
  • All function parameters and return values are annotated with Python type hints.
  • All functions have doctests that pass the automated testing.
  • All new algorithms include at least one URL that points to Wikipedia or another similar explanation.
  • If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the description above includes the issue number(s) with a closing keyword: "Fixes #ISSUE-NUMBER".

The method set_coefficients takes two lists as parameters: one for a_coeffs and one for b_coeffs.
If a_coeffs and b_coeffs are arrays or require specific formats, update accordingly.
@algorithms-keeper
Copy link

Closing this pull request as invalid

@yuvashrikarunakaran, this pull request is being closed as none of the checkboxes have been marked. It is important that you go through the checklist and mark the ones relevant to this pull request. Please read the Contributing guidelines.

If you're facing any problem on how to mark a checkbox, please read the following instructions:

  • Read a point one at a time and think if it is relevant to the pull request or not.
  • If it is, then mark it by putting a x between the square bracket like so: [x]

NOTE: Only [x] is supported so if you have put any other letter or symbol between the brackets, that will be marked as invalid. If that is the case then please open a new pull request with the appropriate changes.

@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot closed this Dec 2, 2024
@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot added the awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed label Dec 2, 2024
@yuvashrikarunakaran
Copy link
Author

Add some algorithmic functions related to the code

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed invalid
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant