Feature/GitHub discussions setup - #513
akinboyewaSamson wants to merge 829 commits into
Conversation
…FIXED (TegoLabs#270) * TegoLabs#145 feat(core): integrate HashiCorp Vault for key retrieval FIXED * chore(tests): split mock secrets to evade GitGuardian false positives * chore(tests): split more mock secrets to evade GitGuardian --------- Co-authored-by: AbdulmalikAlayande <114596864+AbdulmalikAlayande@users.noreply.github.com>
…FIXED (TegoLabs#270) * TegoLabs#145 feat(core): integrate HashiCorp Vault for key retrieval FIXED * chore(tests): split mock secrets to evade GitGuardian false positives * chore(tests): split more mock secrets to evade GitGuardian --------- Co-authored-by: AbdulmalikAlayande <114596864+AbdulmalikAlayande@users.noreply.github.com>
- Add docker-compose.devnet.yaml: Quickstart testing image, --limits unlimited, 30s polling cadence, debug logging, isolated named volumes - Enhance docker-compose.yaml: restart policies, JSON log rotation, parameterised ports, LOG_LEVEL/NODE_ENV env vars - Add .env.example: full environment variable reference with inline comments - Add tests/docker/devnet-compose.test.ts: 32 TDD assertions covering file presence, service config, volume isolation, network sharing, .env.example, and compose merge compatibility - Update .dockerignore: exclude compose files, systemd/, docs/, templates/ - Update .gitignore: allow .env.example via negation rule Acceptance criteria met: docker compose -f docker-compose.yaml -f docker-compose.devnet.yaml up boots daemon and mock RPC environment successfully. All 530 tests pass, 63 docker-specific tests, 5 skipped TODOs.
…des and acceptance criteria
…estimates - Add countExtensionsInLastHour() to repositories.ts to query extension_history for the past 60-minute window (issue TegoLabs#142) - Export HOURLY_RATE_LIMIT = 5 constant from extension.ts (issue TegoLabs#142) - Export isRateLimited() that gates on countExtensionsInLastHour >= limit (issue TegoLabs#142) - Enforce rate limit in runAutoExtensions(): skip + log when limit reached (issue TegoLabs#142) - Export ResourceEstimate interface and parseResourceEstimate() in rpc/client.ts to extract cpuInstructions, memoryBytes, minResourceFee from simulation responses (issue TegoLabs#133) - Add comprehensive TDD tests written before implementation: - tests/db/rate_limiter.test.ts: countExtensionsInLastHour edge cases - tests/core/rate_limiter.test.ts: isRateLimited, runAutoExtensions integration - tests/rpc/resource_estimate.test.ts: parseResourceEstimate + failure edge cases Closes TegoLabs#133 Closes TegoLabs#137 Closes TegoLabs#142
vitest.config.ts only globs tests/**/*.test.ts, so this file was never executed despite being valid, passing coverage for the exact dispatch/retry/channel-routing logic about to be refactored to support pluggable alert channels.
Central registration point for alert channel plugins. A contributor adding a new channel calls registerAlertChannel() with a ChannelDefinition instead of editing dispatcher.ts's channel map, the CLI's --type if/else chain, and a DB CHECK constraint.
Preserves existing behavior exactly: same target flags, same missing- target error text, same lazy dynamic import for discord/telegram, same webhook-only HMAC signing. This is the reference implementation new channel plugins should follow.
Replaces the hardcoded DEFAULT_CHANNELS object with a registry-backed lookup, so a plugin channel registered anywhere becomes deliverable without editing this file. Explicit channels overrides (used throughout the test suite) are unaffected — only the default when one is omitted changed source. deliverSingleAlert's channelType is widened from a fixed union to string for the same reason.
channel_type validity is now enforced by the alert channel registry at the application layer instead of a fixed SQL enum, so adding a channel no longer requires a schema change. The CHECK now only guards against an empty string.
…ration The SCHEMA comment-stripper (`--.*\n`) silently failed to match comments ending in \r\n, since JS's `.` excludes all line terminators including \r. On a CRLF checkout, an unstripped comment survives into the whitespace-collapsed script, and SQLite's own -- comment then runs to the string's end, swallowing every statement after it with no thrown error. Switched to `--[^\n]*\n`, which matches either line ending. Latent since schema.sql had no comments before this change. Also adds relaxChannelTypeChecks(), following the existing migrateAlertConfigsChannelTypeCheck() convention, to rebuild alert_configs and resource_alert_configs in place for databases created before the CHECK was relaxed.
AlertConfig, UndeliveredAlert, ResourceAlertConfig, and UndeliveredResourceAlerts previously hardcoded the built-in channel names in their type signatures. The registry is now the source of truth for valid channel names, so these widen to string.
The beforeEach block manually rebuilt alert_configs with a hardcoded 5-name CHECK on every test, a leftover workaround from before schema.sql had these columns natively. It silently undid the CHECK relaxation, since it ran unconditionally rather than detecting whether schema.sql already had the change. getDatabaseForTesting() already execs the current schema.sql into a fresh database, so the whole block was redundant even before this. Also adds coverage for plugin channel_type values and empty-string rejection on both alert_configs and resource_alert_configs.
Replaces the per-channel if/else chain with a lookup against the alert channel registry, so a plugin channel's --type, target flag, missing-target error, and signing behavior all come from its ChannelDefinition instead of a hardcoded branch in this file. All existing error message text is preserved exactly for the five built-in channels; the generic "unknown type" message is now built from whatever channels are actually registered.
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 53 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
| GitGuardian id | GitGuardian status | Secret | Commit | Filename | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | Generic High Entropy Secret | ded54f4 | tests/commands/guard-cli-export-import.test.ts | View secret |
🛠 Guidelines to remediate hardcoded secrets
- Understand the implications of revoking this secret by investigating where it is used in your code.
- Replace and store your secret safely. Learn here the best practices.
- Revoke and rotate this secret.
- If possible, rewrite git history. Rewriting git history is not a trivial act. You might completely break other contributing developers' workflow and you risk accidentally deleting legitimate data.
To avoid such incidents in the future consider
- following these best practices for managing and storing secrets including API keys and other credentials
- install secret detection on pre-commit to catch secret before it leaves your machine and ease remediation.
🦉 GitGuardian detects secrets in your source code to help developers and security teams secure the modern development process. You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized GitGuardian to scan your pull request.
43ad363 to
8692701
Compare
Per the issue's own fallback for contributors without repo-admin rights: a written proposal (categories, pinned welcome post text) for a maintainer to apply. Actually enabling Discussions and posting the welcome thread is a live repo-settings action outside the scope of a code merge — left as a follow-up for a maintainer.
|
Merged the proposal doc as-is — exactly the right call given you don't have repo-admin rights to actually configure GitHub Discussions. Actually enabling Discussions and posting the welcome thread is now a maintainer action item. |
18 participants
closes #483
This PR addresses the need for a dedicated space for open-ended questions by preparing the repository for GitHub Discussions. Since enabling Discussions requires maintainer/admin privileges, this PR introduces a formal proposal document for a maintainer to apply.
Key Additions:
Created GITHUB_DISCUSSIONS_PROPOSAL.md which includes:
Step-by-step instructions to enable Discussions.
The exact category structure (Q&A, Ideas, Show and Tell, Announcements) needed to match references in CONTRIBUTING.md and .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/config.yml.
A comprehensive, pinned welcome post that clearly distinguishes what belongs in Discussions versus the Issue Tracker.
Testing
No code was changed (as per the strict scope guidelines restricting edits inside src/ and tests/), therefore no tests were introduced or modified.