Repository navigation
Feat/148 adaptive polling intervals - #262
AbdulmalikAlayande merged 3 commits into
Conversation
Add requirements spec for the adaptive polling intervals feature. - Defines 6 requirements covering interval tier calculation, dynamic rescheduling, backward-compatible configuration, a pure computeEffectiveInterval function, observability logging, and re-entrance safety - TTL tiers expressed in ledgers (720 / 17,280 / 120,960) mapping to 1 min / 5 min / 1 hour polling intervals - IntervalPolicy type allows custom tier boundaries; intervalMs override pins a fixed interval (disabling adaptive mode) - Invalid policies throw before daemon starts - Pure computeEffectiveInterval function enables isolated unit testing Closes TegoLabs#148
Add design document and implementation tasks for the adaptive polling intervals feature. - Design covers interval.ts pure module, loop.ts refactor from setInterval to chained setTimeout, IntervalPolicy type, and MonitorCycleResult.remainingTTLs extension - Tasks cover 9 steps: fast-check install, interval.ts creation, monitor.ts extension, loop.ts wiring, build checkpoint, unit tests, property-based tests, integration tests, and final checkpoint Closes TegoLabs#148
|
@nazteeemba Great news! 🎉 Based on an automated assessment of this PR, the linked Wave issue(s) no longer count against your application limits. You can now already apply to more issues while waiting for a review of this PR. Keep up the great work! 🚀 |
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 53 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdded a Kiro feature spec set for adaptive daemon polling, covering requirements, design, and task planning for tier-based interval calculation, chained rescheduling, configuration rules, logging, and test coverage. ChangesAdaptive Polling Interval Specification
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~4 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (2)
.kiro/specs/adaptive-polling-intervals/requirements.md (2)
193-201: 🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick winAdd missing validation rules for
IntervalPolicyboundary ordering andmaxIntervalMsconstraints.The current validation rules (3.4, 3.5) only check tier intervals ≥ 10,000 ms and
minIntervalMsagainst tier intervals. Missing validations that could cause incorrect clamping behavior:
maxIntervalMsshould be ≥minIntervalMs(design mentions this but no validation rule)- Tier boundaries should be strictly ordered:
criticalTtlLedgers<dayTtlLedgers<weekTtlLedgersAdd these to
validateIntervalPolicyin task 2.4 and document in requirements/design to prevent misconfiguration where clamping produces nonsensical results.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In @.kiro/specs/adaptive-polling-intervals/requirements.md around lines 193 - 201, `validateIntervalPolicy` is missing two configuration checks: enforce that `maxIntervalMs` is greater than or equal to `minIntervalMs`, and that the tier boundaries are strictly ordered (`criticalTtlLedgers` < `dayTtlLedgers` < `weekTtlLedgers`). Update the validation logic in the interval policy requirements/design so these rules are documented alongside the existing interval minimum checks, and make sure the new constraints are applied wherever `IntervalPolicy` is validated.
188-188: 📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🟠 Major | ⚖️ Poor tradeoffRemove optional marking from tests — property and integration tests are required per PR objectives.
Tasks marked with
*(6.2, 6.3, 7.1–7.4, 8.1–8.6) are labeled optional, but the PR objectives explicitly require a "test-driven approach, with tests written before implementation, and coverage for edge cases and failure modes." Property-based tests (7.1–7.4) and integration tests (8.1–8.6) are essential for verifying correctness properties and end-to-end behavior. Remove the*marking and optional designation from these tasks.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In @.kiro/specs/adaptive-polling-intervals/requirements.md at line 188, The requirements spec still marks several test tasks as optional, but the PR objectives require them to be mandatory. Update the task list in the adaptive-polling-intervals requirements so the property-based tests (7.1–7.4) and integration tests (8.1–8.6), along with the other listed test tasks (6.2, 6.3), are no longer marked with “*” or described as optional; keep the task names and structure, only remove the optional designation.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In @.kiro/specs/adaptive-polling-intervals/requirements.md:
- Around line 70-72: Add an explicit precedence requirement to the adaptive
polling intervals section so the behavior is unambiguous when both
DaemonOptions.intervalMs and DaemonOptions.intervalPolicy are provided. Update
the requirement set near the existing intervalMs / IntervalPolicy clauses to
state that intervalMs takes precedence and intervalPolicy is ignored in that
case, while keeping the current fixed-interval and default-behavior requirements
intact.
- Around line 46-49: The `MonitorCycleResult` shape is currently inconsistent
with the design claim of a non-breaking addition: `remainingTTLs` is required,
so every constructor, mock, and test creating `MonitorCycleResult` must be
updated unless the field is made optional. Decide whether `remainingTTLs` in
`MonitorCycleResult` should be `remainingTTLs?: number[]` with default handling
in `computeEffectiveInterval`, or explicitly treat it as a breaking change and
update all call sites and fixtures that build `MonitorCycleResult` accordingly.
- Around line 74-76: Clarify the backward-compatibility notes for fixed
intervalMs mode: the scheduler implementation uses chained setTimeout behavior,
which changes timing semantics for slow cycles compared with setInterval. Update
the design/spec section that describes intervalMs so it explicitly states that
wall-clock regularity is not preserved when a cycle runs longer than the
interval, and reference the Scheduler behavior and intervalMs mode so
implementers and testers understand the drift/skipping difference.
In @.kiro/specs/adaptive-polling-intervals/tasks.md:
- Around line 186-192: The note about `vi.advanceTimersByTimeAsync` in the task
list is too absolute for chained `setTimeout` behavior. Rephrase the note to
clarify that while Vitest supports advancing chained timers, the total elapsed
time in `loop.test.ts` includes both the cycle execution time and the timeout
delay, so tests may need timing expectations adjusted accordingly. Keep the
guidance tied to the timer-related tasks and the `setInterval` → `setTimeout`
chain change.
- Around line 197-209: The dependency graph is missing Task 5 and Task 9, so
update the waves structure in the adaptive-polling-intervals task list to
include them. Add Task 5 alongside or immediately after the wave containing 4.4
and 4.5, and add Task 9 as a final wave after the current last wave; keep the
existing wave ordering and task IDs consistent.
- Around line 87-91: The build checkpoint task in the adaptive-polling-intervals
spec should be approved and included in the dependency graph. Update the task
entry for the build/test verification step so it is marked as an approved
checkpoint, and make sure its dependencies are represented consistently with the
surrounding tasks in the spec.
---
Outside diff comments:
In @.kiro/specs/adaptive-polling-intervals/requirements.md:
- Around line 193-201: `validateIntervalPolicy` is missing two configuration
checks: enforce that `maxIntervalMs` is greater than or equal to
`minIntervalMs`, and that the tier boundaries are strictly ordered
(`criticalTtlLedgers` < `dayTtlLedgers` < `weekTtlLedgers`). Update the
validation logic in the interval policy requirements/design so these rules are
documented alongside the existing interval minimum checks, and make sure the new
constraints are applied wherever `IntervalPolicy` is validated.
- Line 188: The requirements spec still marks several test tasks as optional,
but the PR objectives require them to be mandatory. Update the task list in the
adaptive-polling-intervals requirements so the property-based tests (7.1–7.4)
and integration tests (8.1–8.6), along with the other listed test tasks (6.2,
6.3), are no longer marked with “*” or described as optional; keep the task
names and structure, only remove the optional designation.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: ff206202-b659-4dbf-a04e-0ba8cc68e584
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
.kiro/specs/adaptive-polling-intervals/.config.kiro.kiro/specs/adaptive-polling-intervals/design.md.kiro/specs/adaptive-polling-intervals/requirements.md.kiro/specs/adaptive-polling-intervals/tasks.md
📜 Review details
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
.kiro/specs/adaptive-polling-intervals/design.md
[style] ~13-~13: ‘exactly the same’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...xisting users who pass intervalMs get exactly the same behaviour as today. ### Key design goa...
(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_EXACTLY_THE_SAME)
[style] ~363-~363: To form a complete sentence, be sure to include a subject or ‘there’.
Context: ...tive or zero TTL values remainingTTL can be zero or negative when a ledger entry...
(MISSING_IT_THERE)
.kiro/specs/adaptive-polling-intervals/requirements.md
[style] ~60-~60: This phrase is redundant. Consider writing “point” or “time”.
Context: ...at most one pending cycle exists at any point in time. 4. WHEN startDaemon is called, THE S...
(MOMENT_IN_TIME)
[style] ~72-~72: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...y in place of the built-in defaults. 3. WHERE neither intervalMs nor `IntervalPolic...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
[style] ~96-~96: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...terval values in the same log entry. 3. WHEN no TTL data is available (empty watch l...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.22.1)
.kiro/specs/adaptive-polling-intervals/tasks.md
[warning] 83-83: Spaces inside code span elements
(MD038, no-space-in-code)
.kiro/specs/adaptive-polling-intervals/design.md
[warning] 32-32: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
[warning] 178-178: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
[warning] 256-256: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
[warning] 376-376: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
[warning] 382-382: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
[warning] 388-388: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
[warning] 412-412: Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines
(MD031, blanks-around-fences)
[warning] 412-412: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
[warning] 417-417: Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines
(MD031, blanks-around-fences)
[warning] 417-417: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
[warning] 439-439: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
🔇 Additional comments (15)
.kiro/specs/adaptive-polling-intervals/design.md (8)
279-290: 🗄️ Data Integrity & IntegrationReiterate:
remainingTTLsshould be optional or explicitly marked breaking.As noted in the requirements review, claiming this is "non-breaking" is inaccurate if the field is required. The design should either add
?to the type or remove the "non-breaking" claim.
400-479: 📐 Maintainability & Code QualityFlag: Property tests marked optional in tasks contradict this testing strategy.
The design describes a comprehensive testing strategy with property tests, but the tasks.md marks these as optional. Ensure the testing strategy is fully implemented per PR objectives.
96-109: Verify tier interval constants match requirements exactly.The default constants are consistent with requirements. No issue here — approving this section.
118-139: Approve IntervalPolicy interface design.The interface is well-structured with clear JSDoc comments. Optional fields with sensible defaults allow gradual adoption. No issues.
154-174: Approve public API design for pure functions.The
computeEffectiveInterval,validateIntervalPolicy, andttlToIntervalMssignatures are clean, testable, and correctly typed. No issues.
176-191: Approve computeEffectiveInterval algorithm.The four-tier classification with min/max clamping is correct and matches requirements. Edge cases (empty array, negative TTL) are handled appropriately.
302-331: Approve correctness properties.The four properties (tier mapping, range invariant, purity, uniform-array) directly validate requirements and provide good coverage for property-based testing.
370-398: Approve observability design.Log formats are informative and include the required fields (effectiveMs, minTTL, errorCount, intervalChanged). Debug level for empty watch list is appropriate.
.kiro/specs/adaptive-polling-intervals/tasks.md (7)
93-119: 📐 Maintainability & Code QualityReiterate: Remove optional marking from unit tests 6.2 and 6.3.
Edge case and validation tests are essential for a test-driven approach. The
*marking should be removed.
121-148: 📐 Maintainability & Code QualityReiterate: Remove optional marking from property tests 7.1–7.4.
Property tests validate universal invariants and are core to the testing strategy. Must not be optional.
150-179: 📐 Maintainability & Code QualityReiterate: Remove optional marking from integration tests 8.1–8.6.
Integration tests verify end-to-end scheduler behavior and are required for confidence in the setTimeout chaining implementation. Must not be optional.
13-16: Approve fast-check installation task.Standard dev dependency addition. Version specification is reasonable.
18-44: Approve interval.ts implementation tasks.Tasks 2.1–2.4 cover the pure computation module with clear requirements traceability. No issues.
46-49: Approve MonitorCycleResult extension task.Task 3 correctly identifies the needed change. As noted previously, the "non-breaking" claim should be verified.
51-85: Approve loop.ts refactoring tasks.Tasks 4.1–4.5 cover the scheduler wiring comprehensively. The setTimeout chaining approach is correctly described. No issues.
️✅ There are no secrets present in this pull request anymore.If these secrets were true positive and are still valid, we highly recommend you to revoke them. 🦉 GitGuardian detects secrets in your source code to help developers and security teams secure the modern development process. You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized GitGuardian to scan your pull request. |
|
@coderabbitai resolve |
✅ Action performedComments resolved and changes approved. |
* feat(daemon): add spec for adaptive polling intervals (#148) Add requirements spec for the adaptive polling intervals feature. - Defines 6 requirements covering interval tier calculation, dynamic rescheduling, backward-compatible configuration, a pure computeEffectiveInterval function, observability logging, and re-entrance safety - TTL tiers expressed in ledgers (720 / 17,280 / 120,960) mapping to 1 min / 5 min / 1 hour polling intervals - IntervalPolicy type allows custom tier boundaries; intervalMs override pins a fixed interval (disabling adaptive mode) - Invalid policies throw before daemon starts - Pure computeEffectiveInterval function enables isolated unit testing Closes #148 * feat(daemon): add design and tasks for adaptive polling intervals Add design document and implementation tasks for the adaptive polling intervals feature. - Design covers interval.ts pure module, loop.ts refactor from setInterval to chained setTimeout, IntervalPolicy type, and MonitorCycleResult.remainingTTLs extension - Tasks cover 9 steps: fast-check install, interval.ts creation, monitor.ts extension, loop.ts wiring, build checkpoint, unit tests, property-based tests, integration tests, and final checkpoint Closes #148 * fix(docs): address CodeRabbit review feedback --------- Co-authored-by: AbdulmalikAlayande <114596864+AbdulmalikAlayande@users.noreply.github.com>
* feat(daemon): add spec for adaptive polling intervals (#148) Add requirements spec for the adaptive polling intervals feature. - Defines 6 requirements covering interval tier calculation, dynamic rescheduling, backward-compatible configuration, a pure computeEffectiveInterval function, observability logging, and re-entrance safety - TTL tiers expressed in ledgers (720 / 17,280 / 120,960) mapping to 1 min / 5 min / 1 hour polling intervals - IntervalPolicy type allows custom tier boundaries; intervalMs override pins a fixed interval (disabling adaptive mode) - Invalid policies throw before daemon starts - Pure computeEffectiveInterval function enables isolated unit testing Closes #148 * feat(daemon): add design and tasks for adaptive polling intervals Add design document and implementation tasks for the adaptive polling intervals feature. - Design covers interval.ts pure module, loop.ts refactor from setInterval to chained setTimeout, IntervalPolicy type, and MonitorCycleResult.remainingTTLs extension - Tasks cover 9 steps: fast-check install, interval.ts creation, monitor.ts extension, loop.ts wiring, build checkpoint, unit tests, property-based tests, integration tests, and final checkpoint Closes #148 * fix(docs): address CodeRabbit review feedback --------- Co-authored-by: AbdulmalikAlayande <114596864+AbdulmalikAlayande@users.noreply.github.com>
2 participants
closes #148