Skip to content

Conversation

@dardevelin
Copy link

Refactor get_field_attr in library.py:

  • Ensure safety using list slicing to avoid IndexError.
  • Use .get() for dictionary access to handle default cases and prevent KeyError.

Improve control flow in ts_core.py:

  • Remove nesting by exiting early in match_conditions.
  • Eliminate the need for try-catch blocks for better readability and control flow.

Note: Kept existing_fields case unchanged due to add_field_to_entry's procedural nature.

this commit introduces changes to library.py get_field_attr

Refactor get_field_attr in library.py:
- Ensure safety using list slicing to avoid IndexError.
- Use .get() for dictionary access to handle default cases and prevent KeyError.

Improve control flow in ts_core.py:
- Remove nesting by exiting early in match_conditions.
- Eliminate the need for try-catch blocks for better readability and control flow.

Note: Kept existing_fields case unchanged due to add_field_to_entry's procedural nature.

this commit introduces changes to library.py get_field_attr
cleans whitespace from file
Fix get_field_attr in library.py to ensure proper handling of empty keys list:
- Previously, slicing avoided IndexError but returned a list instead.
- Ensure the value is read only if present, defaulting to -1 otherwise.

Ideal scenario: Define this function to return an int, as expected by the software elsewhere.
@dardevelin
Copy link
Author

There is a bug on the assumption for list slicing. Closing and opening a new one with the change fixed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant