Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Volatile Esters & Polyphosphate Reactions #336

Closed

Conversation

uliebal
Copy link

@uliebal uliebal commented May 25, 2023

Main improvements in this PR:

  • Addition of in total 36 reactions: 15 enzymatic reactions, 10 transport and 9 exchange reactions.
  • Addition of in total 26 metabolites.
  • Addition of in total 1 gene.

Volatile esters

  • 8 new distinct ester reactions are introduced, of these 6 had the substrates already in the model and only the ester metabolite was newly added.
  • The esterases have broad substrate flexibility and the existing gene for the esterase was used (YOR126C)
  • For two esters, the acid substrate was not available in the model and a new aldehyde dehydrogenase reaction was added to generate the acid.
  • The aldehyde dehydrogenase was used from an existing gene (YOR374W or YPL061W) which is supported by literature.
  • The ester reactions were added only to the cytoplasm compartment

Polyphosphate reactions

  • A polyphosphate synthesis reaction was added by which cytoplasmic ATP generates diphosphate in the vacuole.
  • The protein Vtc4p is responsible for polyphosphate synthesis, but is part of a heterogeneous protein complex. However, only the direct related gen for Vtc4p, YJL012C, and no complex partners (Vtc1-5) were added to the GPR.
  • Transport of polyphosphate between the compartments was added, as supported by literature. The transport mode was copied from the phosphate transport as H+ symport.
  • Polyphosphate phosphatase was added for compartments vacuole, mitochondria and nucleus according to literature.
  • Inorganic phosphate in the nucleus was added as new metabolite.

Developers

I hereby confirm that I have:

  • Tested my code with all requirements for running the model
  • Selected develop as a target branch (top left drop-down menu)
  • If needed, asked first in the Gitter chat room about this PR

@edkerk edkerk self-assigned this May 29, 2023
@edkerk
Copy link
Member

edkerk commented Jun 4, 2023

This PR does not allow commits from maintainers, as the fork is under an organisation account (and then it doesn't work). Therefore, #337 replaces this PR.

@edkerk edkerk closed this Jun 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants