Added 'ver' action with current version to all necessary rules (fix for #650)

[airween]

This PR fixes #650.

A small footnote for this modification: I generated a spreadsheet for the better visibility of changes.

The column E/F contains the status of actions before, J/K after the modification. The PL control is a formula, if the id of the rule is ended up with ...011, ...012. If it's "yes", then Need 'ver' act. is "no". This means the PL control rules didn't got the ver action now.

Need to add column is "yes" if the action should be at rule (it's not PL control rule) but there isn't yet. If this is "yes" the script added it.

If the rule needs the ver and contains it after the modification, then the Check field is OK - but doesn't matter that the action was present or not. All fields must be OK in this column.

The Changed fields indicates that a change has been made (was not present before - it present after).

Definition of PL control:

id < 1000000 and (id % 1000 >= 100 or id % 1000 <= 10)
  or
id > 1000000

I think this form describes the rules with skipAfter actions and doesn't affect exclusion rules. The modification affects all other SecRule and SecAction entries.

Let me know if there are still missing any ver action, or if it's unnecessary.

Note, of course, the modification follows the expected sequence of actions.

[fzipi]

Now that I see this one, shouldn't we use 3.3 as version?

[airween]

Now that I see this one, shouldn't we use 3.3 as version?

we've discussed about the version, and the conclusion was we can use the 3.2, as in cas of every other rule.

[fzipi]

Cool. So we merge this one, and if we need in the future we update everything to the needed version.

[franbuehler]

In the monthly chat meeting from May 4 we decided to merge this PR:
#1749 (comment)