[1060] Add PL1 tag

[annawinkler]

Per issue #1060, add paranoia-level/1 tag to those rules.

[csanders-git]

I see no issue with this merge any thoughts @dune73

[airween]

I see no issue with this merge any thoughts @dune73

See #1060 :)

[airween]

Let me check this with parser before merge.

[csanders-git]

Can we inline the parser into Travis?

[csanders-git]

Also feel free to merge once you check

[airween]

Can we inline the parser into Travis?

Yes, that's on my todo list - coming soon :)

[airween]

@annawinkler thanks for your patch. I reviewed the modifications with the parser, but I'm afraid there are some missed tag - see this table. You can turn on the filter and can see only the rows with value 0 in column 'L'. (There couldn't be any row with value 0 in this column.)

Here are the rules:
912120
912130
912140
912150
912160
912161
912170

Those rules also activated at PL1, see the setter line.

If you're done, just check your modifications with the given script, which generates the new table. Don't forget to re-build the structure from the modified rules before (with command crs_read.py). Then you can check that everything is well. If you have any question, just let me know :).

[annawinkler]

Thank you for checking this PR @airween! I'll add those rules and double-check per your comment.

[fgsch]

Hi @annawinkler. Are you planning to update this soon~ish or should we consider merging it as is and tackle the remaining rules in a separate PR?

[airween]

I think the separated PR could lead to misunderstanding in this case (if somebody review the commits few mounts later).

[annawinkler]

Sorry for the delay friends! I'll work on this today.

[annawinkler]

@fgsch and @airween I updated the rules and ran airween's script to verify the PL tag correct value in the generated csv file (generated from yaml from the rules). I do not see any 0 values, so I think all of the rules that should be tagged PL1 are. Could you please confirm and let me know? Thanks!

[airween]

Nice work @annawinkler, thank you!