docs: complete frozen fork capability accounting for #100 - #104
Draft
Skywind5487 wants to merge 5 commits into
Draft
docs: complete frozen fork capability accounting for #100#104Skywind5487 wants to merge 5 commits into
Skywind5487 wants to merge 5 commits into
Conversation
This was referenced Aug 16, 2026
This was referenced Aug 16, 2026
Owner
Author
Current-upstream ownership correction discovered from Phase-2 ticket #113Phase-2's mandatory fresh SQLite prior-art pass found that the historical capability promoted here from The frozen Phase-1 provenance remains valid: Primary evidence:
Accordingly, keep this PR's historical capability/provenance record, but downstream/current-upstream composition must treat |
This was referenced Aug 17, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Evidence
35c8564c9c0af3d75bcbdf1d793e7207e5528f06460d345642ee3d143a3e461abe39fd42b86a7e5491937a6dc3ffbbe2f3be91a500f0ecf962c4cf53False-negative corrections
04f1af72/a9d2b9af:threshold_mband independentgc_cooldown_secondsare runtime policy, not only telemetry.176646d2: compressor-reported noop skips session rotation/rewrite; kept separate from lifecycle telemetry.cc2531fb: SQLite retry changes to exponential 20ms-base / 2s-cap backoff; kept separate from incidental diagnostics.b879cbd3: bounded batch context hydration and lock scope are separately accounted from benchmark evidence.7b66bbf8: benchmark cold-open/fallback checks are explicitly retained as validation evidence, not promoted as runtime capability.Durable artifacts
artifacts/fork-archaeology-issue-100/capability-manifest.mdartifacts/fork-archaeology-issue-100/behavioral-coverage-audit.mdartifacts/fork-archaeology-issue-100/behavioral-coverage-audit.jsonartifacts/fork-archaeology-issue-100/inventory.jsonandinventory.mdVerification
scripts/fork_archaeology.pyregenerated inventory artifacts successfully.17 passedfortests/scripts/test_fork_archaeology.pyandtests/scripts/test_capability_manifest.pyvia the repository pytest fallback.scripts/run_tests.shcould not start in this Windows environment because its Bash service returnedE_ACCESSDENIED.Review boundaries
This PR remains draft and does not merge, create
fork/<feature>branches, modify/rewrite/rebasedev, or expand PR #99 tooling. Phase-2 port boundaries and evidence gaps remain recorded indocs/research/fork-capability-accounting-issue-100.md.