-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 887
Make sure magick.net and imagesharp use the same configuration for webp encoding #1808
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0878510
Add EntropyPasses default value explicit to 1
brianpopow 947dc8d
Make sure magick.net and imagesharp use the same configuration
brianpopow 55b67ad
Use webpMagick.Quality for the quality parameter
brianpopow 2b6dbbc
Update benchmark results
brianpopow 955b4ab
Merge branch 'master' into bp/webpbenchmarks
brianpopow 53f278d
Merge branch 'master' into bp/webpbenchmarks
JimBobSquarePants File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@dlemstra the
exactandqualityparameters seem to be missing inWebPWriteDefines. Should they maybe be added toWebPWriteDefines? If you think that makes sense, i could open a PR at Magick.Net.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure if we need to
exactoption. You can usethis.webpMagick.Settings.Qualityto set the quality. Setting the quality too100might enable this?Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If i dont set it, the libwebp default will be used, right? The default is false.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The
IMagickSettingsinterface does not seem to have a Quality Property.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry my bad, that should be
webpMagick.Qualityinstead. And I just added theExactproperty to theWebPWriteDefines. This will become available in the next release. And setting theQualityto100will make it lossless.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No problem, thanks for adding
exacttoWebPWriteDefines