Skip to content

merging rrfs.v1.0.0 into test#2

Merged
ShunLiu-NOAA merged 15 commits into
testfrom
rrfs.v1.0.0
Jan 23, 2026
Merged

merging rrfs.v1.0.0 into test#2
ShunLiu-NOAA merged 15 commits into
testfrom
rrfs.v1.0.0

Conversation

@ShunLiu-NOAA
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Description

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

Checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • New and existing tests pass with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published

hu5970 and others added 15 commits May 7, 2024 11:25
This PR is to bring read_radar bug fix (NOAA-EMC#738) committed in the develop branch to RRFS release branch.
NOAA-EMC#841)

add GDIT's performance optimization for RRFS to release branch
initialize variables in observer_fv3reg.f90 to avoid the warning message when compiling
…OAA-EMC#862)

This is a draft PR to show fix for problems when running ctests using
debug mode built GSI at rrfs.1.0.0.
This makes small changes needed for this branch to work with BUFR/12.2,
which is the version being used for the RRFS implementation.
Add the GOES-19 satellite ID to the read-in list so that RRFSv1 can
properly use abi_g19 data.
merge EMC repo/Release/rrfs.v1.0.0 to my fork
@ShunLiu-NOAA ShunLiu-NOAA marked this pull request as ready for review January 23, 2026 19:23
@ShunLiu-NOAA ShunLiu-NOAA merged commit 0a76605 into test Jan 23, 2026
4 of 8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants