Fix the output for unhandled errors

[gonzaloriestra]

WHY are these changes introduced?

Unhandled errors are shown twice:

WHAT is this pull request doing?

• Sets the flag skipOclifErrorHandling to prevent Oclif from printing the error, which is already shown by the CLI
• Skips the stacktrace for API errors, which is not useful (it always points to the code where the request is made)

How to test your changes?

• Edit packages/cli/src/cli/commands/version.ts and add throw new Error('Boom!') at the beginning of run()
• p shopify version

Measuring impact

How do we know this change was effective? Please choose one:

• n/a - this doesn't need measurement, e.g. a linting rule or a bug-fix
• Existing analytics will cater for this addition
• PR includes analytics changes to measure impact

Checklist

• I've considered possible cross-platform impacts (Mac, Linux, Windows)
• I've considered possible documentation changes
• I've made sure that any changes to dev or deploy have been reflected in the internal flowchart.

[github-actions]

Thanks for your contribution!

Depending on what you are working on, you may want to request a review from a Shopify team:

• Themes: @shopify/advanced-edits
• UI extensions: @shopify/ui-extensions-cli
  • Checkout UI extensions: @shopify/checkout-ui-extensions-api-stewardship
• Hydrogen: @shopify/hydrogen
• Other: @shopify/app-management

[github-actions]

Coverage report

St.❔	Category	Percentage	Covered / Total
🟡	Statements	71.92% (-0.02% 🔻)	7236/10061
🟡	Branches	69.06% (-0.02% 🔻)	3565/5162
🟡	Functions	71.57%	1936/2705
🟡	Lines	73.19% (-0.03% 🔻)	6813/9309

Show files with reduced coverage 🔻

St.❔	File	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
🟡	... / headers.ts	77.27% (-3.68% 🔻)	87.5%	77.78%	76.19% (-3.81% 🔻)
🟢	... / ConcurrentOutput.tsx	98.36% (-1.64% 🔻)	88.89% (-5.56% 🔻)	100%	98.31% (-1.69% 🔻)
🟢	... / base-command.ts	84.21% (-1.12% 🔻)	81.25%	77.27%	84.85% (-1.31% 🔻)

Test suite run success

1684 tests passing in 781 suites.

Report generated by 🧪jest coverage report action from 08b6acc

[github-actions]

Differences in type declarations

We detected differences in the type declarations generated by Typescript for this branch compared to the baseline ('main' branch). Please, review them to ensure they are backward-compatible. Here are some important things to keep in mind:

• Some seemingly private modules might be re-exported through public modules.
• If the branch is behind main you might see odd diffs, rebase main into this branch.

New type declarations

We found no new type declarations in this PR

Existing type declarations

packages/cli-kit/dist/public/node/base-command.d.ts

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ declare abstract class BaseCommand extends Command {
     static analyticsNameOverride(): string | undefined;
     static analyticsStopCommand(): string | undefined;
     catch(error: Error & {
-        exitCode?: number | undefined;
+        skipOclifErrorHandling: boolean;
     }): Promise<void>;
     protected init(): Promise<any>;
     protected showNpmFlagWarning(): void;