Skip to content

[NV] perf: update MiniMax-M3 FP4 B300 vLLM - #1990

Merged
adibarra merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
codex/minimax-m3-b300-fp4-vllm-update
Jul 2, 2026
Merged

adibarra merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
codex/minimax-m3-b300-fp4-vllm-update

perf: update MiniMax-M3 FP4 B300 vLLM

f7286c1
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
Claude / Claude Code Review completed Jul 2, 2026 in 4m 58s

Code review found 2 potential issues

Found 5 candidates, confirmed 2. See review comments for details.

Details

Severity Count
🔴 Important 0
🟡 Nit 2
🟣 Pre-existing 0
Severity File:Line Issue
🟡 Nit perf-changelog.yaml:4430-4435 perf-changelog entry: branch pr-link and misleading description
🟡 Nit .github/configs/nvidia-master.yaml:12812 Stale comment references perf container image after switch to nightly

Annotations

Check warning on line 4435 in perf-changelog.yaml

See this annotation in the file changed.

@claude claude / Claude Code Review

perf-changelog entry: branch pr-link and misleading description

The new `perf-changelog.yaml` entry has two issues: (1) `pr-link` uses a branch URL (`tree/codex/minimax-m3-b300-fp4-vllm-update`) instead of the canonical `pull/1990` form used by every other entry in the file — this will 404 once the branch is deleted after merge; (2) the description says "Update search space to cover more configs", but the diff actually narrows the sweep (isl 1024: 7→4 entries, isl 8192: 6→4 entries, all TP8/EP8 and TP4/EP4 lanes dropped). Consider phrasing similar to the nei

Check warning on line 12812 in .github/configs/nvidia-master.yaml

See this annotation in the file changed.

@claude claude / Claude Code Review

Stale comment references perf container image after switch to nightly

The block comment just above this line still says the NVFP4 support 'is baked into the perf container image', but the PR swaps the image from the bespoke `vllm-minimax-m3-perf-*` tag to a mainline `nightly-*` tag. Update the comment to say the support has landed in vLLM main and is picked up from nightly so future readers don't chase a nonexistent perf image. Note: the same wording appears at lines 12839-12840 for the EAGLE3 variant (whose image is NOT changed in this PR), so that comment remain