Revert SciTools/iris#5763

[trexfeathers]

🚀 Pull Request

Description

#5776 shows promise but can't currently be demonstrated while the failed attempt at labelling is still present.

---

Consult Iris pull request check list

[trexfeathers]

@HGWright if you thought it better for traceability: we could keep the labeler action IN ADDITION to #5776? As we know, adding the label won't always actually trigger the benchmarks, but it would flag up anything that is being benchmarked via the alternative trigger!

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.74%. Comparing base (8998779) to head (ed9fa4c).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #5779   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.74%   89.74%           
=======================================
  Files          92       92           
  Lines       22940    22940           
  Branches     5462     5462           
=======================================
  Hits        20588    20588           
  Misses       1620     1620           
  Partials      732      732           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[trexfeathers]

@HGWright if you thought it better for traceability: we could keep the labeler action IN ADDITION to #5776? As we know, adding the label won't always actually trigger the benchmarks, but it would flag up anything that is being benchmarked via the alternative trigger!

Closing after offline conversation