Skip to content

Conversation

@stephenworsley
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Pull Request

Quick fix to the regrid docs.

@stephenworsley stephenworsley marked this pull request as ready for review February 20, 2024 11:59
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 20, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (a47fd34) 89.71% compared to head (48691b1) 89.74%.
Report is 17 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5758      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   89.71%   89.74%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          90       91       +1     
  Lines       22815    22925     +110     
  Branches     5438     5462      +24     
==========================================
+ Hits        20468    20573     +105     
- Misses       1617     1620       +3     
- Partials      730      732       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@trexfeathers trexfeathers merged commit e9b5b3a into SciTools:main Feb 20, 2024
tkknight added a commit to tkknight/iris that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2024
…umpydoc-pre-commit

* 'numpydoc-pre-commit' of github.com:tkknight/iris:
  Update CF standard names to v84. (SciTools#5761)
  Regrid docs fix (SciTools#5758)
  Improve ncdata and CF information on "iris heart xarray" page (SciTools#5752)
  Pin ASV - airspeed-velocity/asv#1385. (SciTools#5756)
  Normalise units of coordinate bounds (SciTools#5746)
  Add "Which Regridder?" Documentation (SciTools#5742)
  Document `Coord.ignore_axis` (SciTools#5744)
  Disable navidation with keys for docs HTML theme options (SciTools#5747)
  Shapefile masking (SciTools#5470)
  [pre-commit.ci] pre-commit autoupdate (SciTools#5739)
  DOCS: Add whatsnew for ruff pydocstyle compliance (SciTools#5700)
  update docstring (SciTools#5737)
  Updated environment lockfiles (SciTools#5738)
  Consider NaNs equal when comparing cubes (SciTools#5713)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants