Skip to content

Conversation

@stephenworsley
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes one of the tests failing in #3731.

@abooton abooton changed the title Fix unit loading test [FB] [PI-3708] Fix unit loading test Jun 10, 2020
@abooton abooton added this to the v3.0.0 milestone Jun 10, 2020
@abooton
Copy link
Contributor

abooton commented Jun 10, 2020

If my understanding is correct that CF allows us to represent "unknown" using the ? symbol then this looks fine to me. @pp-mo can you confirm please.

@pp-mo pp-mo merged commit 94d5619 into SciTools:default_units Jun 10, 2020
@pp-mo
Copy link
Member

pp-mo commented Jun 10, 2020

Thanks @stephenworsley
Works fine, and makes sense to me.

abooton added a commit to abooton/iris that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2020
…its_merge

* upstream/default_units:
  fix test (SciTools#3732)
  Unify saving behaviour of "unknown" and "no_unit" (SciTools#3711)
  Change default loading unit from "1" to "unknown" (correct branch) (SciTools#3709)
  Change default units to "unknown" for all DimensionalMetadata (SciTools#3713)
trexfeathers pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2020
* Change default units to "unknown" for all DimensionalMetadata (#3713)

* Change default loading unit from "1" to "unknown" (correct branch) (#3709)

* Unify saving behaviour of "unknown" and "no_unit" (#3711)

* fix test (#3732)

Co-authored-by: stephenworsley <[email protected]>
stephenworsley added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2020
* Change default units to "unknown" for all DimensionalMetadata (#3713)

* Change default loading unit from "1" to "unknown" (correct branch) (#3709)

* Unify saving behaviour of "unknown" and "no_unit" (#3711)

* fix test (#3732)

Co-authored-by: stephenworsley <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants