Fix travis ci #91
Merged
Fix travis ci #91
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
1 similar comment
Member
Author
|
Ping @pelson ... fancy reviewing this? The |
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR fixes the currently broken
travis-citests.I decided to flip back to
unittestfrompytest, simply because I couldn't get it to work usingpytest(as it stood)I also stopped
travis-cifrom pullingudunits2fromscitools😱 , in preference fromdefaults. Moving to a more recent version ofudunits2i.e.2.2.20fromscitoolsto2.2.25fromanacondahighlighted that we had broken tests.The tests were attempting to perform cross calendar
datetimecomparisions, which you can't do now (and I didn't know that you could ever do that)