Setup OrdinaryDiffEq for norecompile mode #1627
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ChrisRackauckas
added a commit
to SciML/DiffEqBase.jl
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2022
Needs: - SciML/SciMLBase.jl#143 - SciML/OrdinaryDiffEq.jl#1627 ```julia using OrdinaryDiffEq function f(du, u, p, t) du[1] = 0.2u[1] du[2] = 0.4u[2] end u0 = ones(2) tspan = (0.0, 1.0) prob = ODEProblem{true,false}(f, u0, tspan, Float64[]) function lorenz(du, u, p, t) du[1] = 10.0(u[2] - u[1]) du[2] = u[1] * (28.0 - u[3]) - u[2] du[3] = u[1] * u[2] - (8 / 3) * u[3] end lorenzprob = ODEProblem{true,false}(lorenz, [1.0; 0.0; 0.0], (0.0, 1.0), Float64[]) typeof(prob) === typeof(lorenzprob) # true @time sol = solve(prob, Rosenbrock23(autodiff=false)) @time sol = solve(prob, Rosenbrock23(chunk_size=1)) ``` ``` 2.763588 seconds (10.32 M allocations: 648.718 MiB, 4.92% gc time, 99.89% compilation time) 10.577789 seconds (45.44 M allocations: 2.760 GiB, 4.87% gc time, 99.97% compilation time) ``` While the types of `prob` are exactly the same, there is still a significant amount of compile time, even with that exact same time being called in `using` at OrdinaryDiffEq. Maybe this needs to be run on master?
ChrisRackauckas
added a commit
to SciML/DiffEqBase.jl
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 25, 2022
Needs: - SciML/SciMLBase.jl#143 - SciML/OrdinaryDiffEq.jl#1627 ```julia using OrdinaryDiffEq function f(du, u, p, t) du[1] = 0.2u[1] du[2] = 0.4u[2] end u0 = ones(2) tspan = (0.0, 1.0) prob = ODEProblem{true,false}(f, u0, tspan, Float64[]) function lorenz(du, u, p, t) du[1] = 10.0(u[2] - u[1]) du[2] = u[1] * (28.0 - u[3]) - u[2] du[3] = u[1] * u[2] - (8 / 3) * u[3] end lorenzprob = ODEProblem{true,false}(lorenz, [1.0; 0.0; 0.0], (0.0, 1.0), Float64[]) typeof(prob) === typeof(lorenzprob) # true @time sol = solve(prob, Rosenbrock23(autodiff=false)) @time sol = solve(prob, Rosenbrock23(chunk_size=1)) ``` ``` 2.763588 seconds (10.32 M allocations: 648.718 MiB, 4.92% gc time, 99.89% compilation time) 10.577789 seconds (45.44 M allocations: 2.760 GiB, 4.87% gc time, 99.97% compilation time) ``` While the types of `prob` are exactly the same, there is still a significant amount of compile time, even with that exact same time being called in `using` at OrdinaryDiffEq. Maybe this needs to be run on master?
ChrisRackauckas
force-pushed
the
norecompile
branch
2 times, most recently
from
0e2f0a0 to
21516a9
Compare
ChrisRackauckas
force-pushed
the
norecompile
branch
2 times, most recently
from
6b46941 to
7859be4
Compare
ChrisRackauckas
force-pushed
the
norecompile
branch
from
7859be4 to
f6c6f6d
Compare
ChrisRackauckas
added a commit
to SciML/DiffEqBase.jl
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 22, 2022
Needs: - SciML/SciMLBase.jl#143 - SciML/OrdinaryDiffEq.jl#1627 ```julia using OrdinaryDiffEq function f(du, u, p, t) du[1] = 0.2u[1] du[2] = 0.4u[2] end u0 = ones(2) tspan = (0.0, 1.0) prob = ODEProblem{true,false}(f, u0, tspan, Float64[]) function lorenz(du, u, p, t) du[1] = 10.0(u[2] - u[1]) du[2] = u[1] * (28.0 - u[3]) - u[2] du[3] = u[1] * u[2] - (8 / 3) * u[3] end lorenzprob = ODEProblem{true,false}(lorenz, [1.0; 0.0; 0.0], (0.0, 1.0), Float64[]) typeof(prob) === typeof(lorenzprob) # true @time sol = solve(prob, Rosenbrock23(autodiff=false)) @time sol = solve(prob, Rosenbrock23(chunk_size=1)) ``` ``` 2.763588 seconds (10.32 M allocations: 648.718 MiB, 4.92% gc time, 99.89% compilation time) 10.577789 seconds (45.44 M allocations: 2.760 GiB, 4.87% gc time, 99.97% compilation time) ``` While the types of `prob` are exactly the same, there is still a significant amount of compile time, even with that exact same time being called in `using` at OrdinaryDiffEq. Maybe this needs to be run on master?
ChrisRackauckas
added a commit
to SciML/DiffEqBase.jl
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 22, 2022
This is a continuation of #736 instead using OpaqueClosures. As such, it also requires: - SciML/SciMLBase.jl#143 - SciML/OrdinaryDiffEq.jl#1627 But now the MWE doesn't run: ```julia using OrdinaryDiffEq function f(du, u, p, t) du[1] = 0.2u[1] du[2] = 0.4u[2] end u0 = ones(2) tspan = (0.0, 1.0) prob = ODEProblem{true,false}(f, u0, tspan, Float64[]) function lorenz(du, u, p, t) du[1] = 10.0(u[2] - u[1]) du[2] = u[1] * (28.0 - u[3]) - u[2] du[3] = u[1] * u[2] - (8 / 3) * u[3] end lorenzprob = ODEProblem{true,false}(lorenz, [1.0; 0.0; 0.0], (0.0, 1.0), Float64[]) typeof(prob) === typeof(lorenzprob) # true @time sol = solve(prob, Rosenbrock23(autodiff=false)) @time sol = solve(prob, Rosenbrock23(chunk_size=1)) ``` ```julia [ Info: Precompiling OrdinaryDiffEq [1dea7af3-3e70-54e6-95c3-0bf5283fa5ed] fatal: error thrown and no exception handler available. ErrorException("unimplemented: serialization of MethodInstances for OpaqueClosure") jl_error at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\rtutils.c:41 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:686 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:526 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:661 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:565 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:675 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:870 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:870 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:834 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_serialize_datatype at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:310 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:605 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_serialize_module at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:357 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:733 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_serialize_module at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:345 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:733 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:565 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_save_incremental at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:2289 jl_write_compiler_output at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\precompile.c:65 jl_atexit_hook at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\init.c:211 jl_repl_entrypoint at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\jlapi.c:702 mainCRTStartup at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/cli\loader_exe.c:42 BaseThreadInitThunk at C:\WINDOWS\System32\KERNEL32.DLL (unknown line) RtlUserThreadStart at C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\ntdll.dll (unknown line) ``` The precompilation from SciML/OrdinaryDiffEq.jl#1627 seems to not work with opaque closures. Do they not support precompilation? @Keno
ChrisRackauckas
added a commit
to SciML/DiffEqBase.jl
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 20, 2022
Needs: - SciML/SciMLBase.jl#143 - SciML/OrdinaryDiffEq.jl#1627 ```julia using OrdinaryDiffEq function f(du, u, p, t) du[1] = 0.2u[1] du[2] = 0.4u[2] end u0 = ones(2) tspan = (0.0, 1.0) prob = ODEProblem{true,false}(f, u0, tspan, Float64[]) function lorenz(du, u, p, t) du[1] = 10.0(u[2] - u[1]) du[2] = u[1] * (28.0 - u[3]) - u[2] du[3] = u[1] * u[2] - (8 / 3) * u[3] end lorenzprob = ODEProblem{true,false}(lorenz, [1.0; 0.0; 0.0], (0.0, 1.0), Float64[]) typeof(prob) === typeof(lorenzprob) # true @time sol = solve(prob, Rosenbrock23(autodiff=false)) @time sol = solve(prob, Rosenbrock23(chunk_size=1)) ``` ``` 2.763588 seconds (10.32 M allocations: 648.718 MiB, 4.92% gc time, 99.89% compilation time) 10.577789 seconds (45.44 M allocations: 2.760 GiB, 4.87% gc time, 99.97% compilation time) ``` While the types of `prob` are exactly the same, there is still a significant amount of compile time, even with that exact same time being called in `using` at OrdinaryDiffEq. Maybe this needs to be run on master?
ChrisRackauckas
added a commit
to SciML/DiffEqBase.jl
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 20, 2022
This is a continuation of #736 instead using OpaqueClosures. As such, it also requires: - SciML/SciMLBase.jl#143 - SciML/OrdinaryDiffEq.jl#1627 But now the MWE doesn't run: ```julia using OrdinaryDiffEq function f(du, u, p, t) du[1] = 0.2u[1] du[2] = 0.4u[2] end u0 = ones(2) tspan = (0.0, 1.0) prob = ODEProblem{true,false}(f, u0, tspan, Float64[]) function lorenz(du, u, p, t) du[1] = 10.0(u[2] - u[1]) du[2] = u[1] * (28.0 - u[3]) - u[2] du[3] = u[1] * u[2] - (8 / 3) * u[3] end lorenzprob = ODEProblem{true,false}(lorenz, [1.0; 0.0; 0.0], (0.0, 1.0), Float64[]) typeof(prob) === typeof(lorenzprob) # true @time sol = solve(prob, Rosenbrock23(autodiff=false)) @time sol = solve(prob, Rosenbrock23(chunk_size=1)) ``` ```julia [ Info: Precompiling OrdinaryDiffEq [1dea7af3-3e70-54e6-95c3-0bf5283fa5ed] fatal: error thrown and no exception handler available. ErrorException("unimplemented: serialization of MethodInstances for OpaqueClosure") jl_error at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\rtutils.c:41 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:686 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:526 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:661 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:565 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:675 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:870 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:870 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:834 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_serialize_datatype at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:310 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:605 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_serialize_module at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:357 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:733 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_serialize_module at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:345 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:733 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:565 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_save_incremental at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:2289 jl_write_compiler_output at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\precompile.c:65 jl_atexit_hook at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\init.c:211 jl_repl_entrypoint at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\jlapi.c:702 mainCRTStartup at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/cli\loader_exe.c:42 BaseThreadInitThunk at C:\WINDOWS\System32\KERNEL32.DLL (unknown line) RtlUserThreadStart at C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\ntdll.dll (unknown line) ``` The precompilation from SciML/OrdinaryDiffEq.jl#1627 seems to not work with opaque closures. Do they not support precompilation? @Keno
ChrisRackauckas
force-pushed
the
norecompile
branch
from
9ede3b6 to
d8adc17
Compare
ChrisRackauckas
added a commit
to SciML/DiffEqBase.jl
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 20, 2022
This is a continuation of #736 instead using OpaqueClosures. As such, it also requires: - SciML/SciMLBase.jl#143 - SciML/OrdinaryDiffEq.jl#1627 But now the MWE doesn't run: ```julia using OrdinaryDiffEq function f(du, u, p, t) du[1] = 0.2u[1] du[2] = 0.4u[2] end u0 = ones(2) tspan = (0.0, 1.0) prob = ODEProblem{true,false}(f, u0, tspan, Float64[]) function lorenz(du, u, p, t) du[1] = 10.0(u[2] - u[1]) du[2] = u[1] * (28.0 - u[3]) - u[2] du[3] = u[1] * u[2] - (8 / 3) * u[3] end lorenzprob = ODEProblem{true,false}(lorenz, [1.0; 0.0; 0.0], (0.0, 1.0), Float64[]) typeof(prob) === typeof(lorenzprob) # true @time sol = solve(prob, Rosenbrock23(autodiff=false)) @time sol = solve(prob, Rosenbrock23(chunk_size=1)) ``` ```julia [ Info: Precompiling OrdinaryDiffEq [1dea7af3-3e70-54e6-95c3-0bf5283fa5ed] fatal: error thrown and no exception handler available. ErrorException("unimplemented: serialization of MethodInstances for OpaqueClosure") jl_error at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\rtutils.c:41 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:686 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:526 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:661 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:565 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:675 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:870 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:870 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:834 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_serialize_datatype at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:310 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:605 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_serialize_module at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:357 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:733 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_serialize_module at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:345 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:733 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:565 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_save_incremental at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:2289 jl_write_compiler_output at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\precompile.c:65 jl_atexit_hook at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\init.c:211 jl_repl_entrypoint at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\jlapi.c:702 mainCRTStartup at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/cli\loader_exe.c:42 BaseThreadInitThunk at C:\WINDOWS\System32\KERNEL32.DLL (unknown line) RtlUserThreadStart at C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\ntdll.dll (unknown line) ``` The precompilation from SciML/OrdinaryDiffEq.jl#1627 seems to not work with opaque closures. Do they not support precompilation? @Keno
ChrisRackauckas
added a commit
to SciML/DiffEqBase.jl
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 20, 2022
This is a continuation of #736 instead using OpaqueClosures. As such, it also requires: - SciML/SciMLBase.jl#143 - SciML/OrdinaryDiffEq.jl#1627 But now the MWE doesn't run: ```julia using OrdinaryDiffEq function f(du, u, p, t) du[1] = 0.2u[1] du[2] = 0.4u[2] end u0 = ones(2) tspan = (0.0, 1.0) prob = ODEProblem{true,false}(f, u0, tspan, Float64[]) function lorenz(du, u, p, t) du[1] = 10.0(u[2] - u[1]) du[2] = u[1] * (28.0 - u[3]) - u[2] du[3] = u[1] * u[2] - (8 / 3) * u[3] end lorenzprob = ODEProblem{true,false}(lorenz, [1.0; 0.0; 0.0], (0.0, 1.0), Float64[]) typeof(prob) === typeof(lorenzprob) # true @time sol = solve(prob, Rosenbrock23(autodiff=false)) @time sol = solve(prob, Rosenbrock23(chunk_size=1)) ``` ```julia [ Info: Precompiling OrdinaryDiffEq [1dea7af3-3e70-54e6-95c3-0bf5283fa5ed] fatal: error thrown and no exception handler available. ErrorException("unimplemented: serialization of MethodInstances for OpaqueClosure") jl_error at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\rtutils.c:41 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:686 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:526 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:661 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:565 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:675 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:870 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:870 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:834 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_serialize_datatype at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:310 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:605 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_serialize_module at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:357 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:733 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_serialize_module at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:345 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:733 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:565 jl_serialize_value_ at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:510 [inlined] jl_save_incremental at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\dump.c:2289 jl_write_compiler_output at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\precompile.c:65 jl_atexit_hook at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\init.c:211 jl_repl_entrypoint at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/src\jlapi.c:702 mainCRTStartup at /cygdrive/c/buildbot/worker/package_win64/build/cli\loader_exe.c:42 BaseThreadInitThunk at C:\WINDOWS\System32\KERNEL32.DLL (unknown line) RtlUserThreadStart at C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\ntdll.dll (unknown line) ``` The precompilation from SciML/OrdinaryDiffEq.jl#1627 seems to not work with opaque closures. Do they not support precompilation? @Keno
ChrisRackauckas
added a commit
to SciML/DiffEqBase.jl
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 20, 2022
Needs: - SciML/SciMLBase.jl#143 - SciML/OrdinaryDiffEq.jl#1627 ```julia using OrdinaryDiffEq function f(du, u, p, t) du[1] = 0.2u[1] du[2] = 0.4u[2] end u0 = ones(2) tspan = (0.0, 1.0) prob = ODEProblem{true,false}(f, u0, tspan, Float64[]) function lorenz(du, u, p, t) du[1] = 10.0(u[2] - u[1]) du[2] = u[1] * (28.0 - u[3]) - u[2] du[3] = u[1] * u[2] - (8 / 3) * u[3] end lorenzprob = ODEProblem{true,false}(lorenz, [1.0; 0.0; 0.0], (0.0, 1.0), Float64[]) typeof(prob) === typeof(lorenzprob) # true @time sol = solve(prob, Rosenbrock23(autodiff=false)) @time sol = solve(prob, Rosenbrock23(chunk_size=1)) ``` ``` 2.763588 seconds (10.32 M allocations: 648.718 MiB, 4.92% gc time, 99.89% compilation time) 10.577789 seconds (45.44 M allocations: 2.760 GiB, 4.87% gc time, 99.97% compilation time) ``` While the types of `prob` are exactly the same, there is still a significant amount of compile time, even with that exact same time being called in `using` at OrdinaryDiffEq. Maybe this needs to be run on master?
ChrisRackauckas
force-pushed
the
norecompile
branch
from
567cbbd to
7c161df
Compare
ChrisRackauckas
added a commit
to SciML/DiffEqBase.jl
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 21, 2022
* Setup FunctionWrappersWrappers norecompile mode Needs: - SciML/SciMLBase.jl#143 - SciML/OrdinaryDiffEq.jl#1627 ```julia using OrdinaryDiffEq function f(du, u, p, t) du[1] = 0.2u[1] du[2] = 0.4u[2] end u0 = ones(2) tspan = (0.0, 1.0) prob = ODEProblem{true,false}(f, u0, tspan, Float64[]) function lorenz(du, u, p, t) du[1] = 10.0(u[2] - u[1]) du[2] = u[1] * (28.0 - u[3]) - u[2] du[3] = u[1] * u[2] - (8 / 3) * u[3] end lorenzprob = ODEProblem{true,false}(lorenz, [1.0; 0.0; 0.0], (0.0, 1.0), Float64[]) typeof(prob) === typeof(lorenzprob) # true @time sol = solve(prob, Rosenbrock23(autodiff=false)) @time sol = solve(prob, Rosenbrock23(chunk_size=1)) ``` ``` 2.763588 seconds (10.32 M allocations: 648.718 MiB, 4.92% gc time, 99.89% compilation time) 10.577789 seconds (45.44 M allocations: 2.760 GiB, 4.87% gc time, 99.97% compilation time) ``` While the types of `prob` are exactly the same, there is still a significant amount of compile time, even with that exact same time being called in `using` at OrdinaryDiffEq. Maybe this needs to be run on master? * with extra specialization! * try `@nospecialize` on the arguments * force precompilation? * try more * no precompile file * add sys * do not require SciMLBase changes and support oop * fix oop handling
5 tasks
ChrisRackauckas
force-pushed
the
norecompile
branch
from
7c161df to
7d2d935
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.