-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 76
Use AbstractSparseMatrixCSC for sparse factorizations #273
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #273 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 70.97% 35.86% -35.12%
===========================================
Files 14 11 -3
Lines 858 764 -94
===========================================
- Hits 609 274 -335
- Misses 249 490 +241
📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
|
Anywhere that assumes it's a sparsematrixcsc should not remove the conversion because that could concrete things like MatrixOperators of SparseMatrixCSC. For things that are already concrete matrices it should be a no-op so that's fine, and then afterwards it should assert it's an AbstractSparseMatrixCSC and use the sparse matrix functions on it. |
|
👍 |
|
Hi,I think we need a version update for LinearSolvePardiso.jl as well to bring this in place there. |
|
It should probably be changed into an extension package in the near future. |
This e.g. would allow to supply a matrix type with multithreaded factorization etc. Would solve #190.
However, see JuliaSparse/SparseArrays.jl#265 .