Focus the extension when receiving bridge commands

[cte]

fix.mp4

---

Important

Focuses the extension's sidebar when receiving bridge commands by updating BaseChannel and refactoring BridgeOrchestrator.

• Behavior:
  • BaseChannel now focuses the sidebar using vscode.commands.executeCommand before handling commands.
  • BridgeOrchestrator refactored to separate connect and disconnect logic.
• Classes:
  • BaseChannel: Updated handleCommand to focus sidebar before delegating to handleCommandImplementation.
  • BridgeOrchestrator: Refactored connectOrDisconnect into connect and disconnect methods.
  • ExtensionChannel and TaskChannel: Updated constructors to use BaseChannelOptions.
• Tests:
  • Updated tests in ExtensionChannel.test.ts and TaskChannel.test.ts to reflect changes in command handling and channel initialization.

^{This description was created by for ca86c7b. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[roomote]

Thank you for your contribution! I've reviewed the changes and found that the implementation is solid overall. The refactoring to use the template method pattern in BaseChannel is a clean architectural improvement. I've left some suggestions inline to help improve error handling and robustness.

[roomote]

Good implementation of the template method pattern! The separation between common functionality (focus) and subclass-specific logic is clean.

However, I have two concerns about the focus command execution:

1. Potential Race Condition: The focus command is executed asynchronously, but we don't wait for confirmation that the focus actually succeeded before proceeding. Could this lead to commands being processed before the UI is ready?

2. Error Handling: Consider wrapping this in a try-catch block. If the focus command fails (e.g., extension not fully loaded), should we still proceed with command handling?

[roomote]

Is this version bump following semantic versioning correctly? This seems like a minor feature addition (adding focus behavior) rather than a breaking change. Should this perhaps be 1.69.1 instead of 1.70.0?

[roomote]

Good job updating the tests to accommodate the new constructor signatures! However, would it be valuable to add specific tests that verify the focus command is called before command handling? This would help ensure the new behavior is properly tested.

[daniel-lxs]

Looks good, the only issue is the failing unit test